- Trump accuses Jewish Democrats of having ‘great disloyalty’ or a ‘lack of knowledge’ Tuesday 8:02 PM
- 1 million ‘anonymous’ users of popular porn site exposed in breach Tuesday 6:56 PM
- Khloé Kardashian angers followers with a calorie-counting joke about True Tuesday 6:14 PM
- Spider-Man may no longer be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Tuesday 5:28 PM
- Robert De Niro’s company is suing ex-employee for binge-watching Netflix at work Tuesday 4:41 PM
- Intentionally misgendering a character could get you banned from Borderlands 3 Tuesday 4:06 PM
- Facebook pulls Trump re-election ad for targeting ‘strong women’ Tuesday 4:03 PM
- Kamala Harris says she will restore net neutrality if elected Tuesday 3:16 PM
- All 8 of the ‘Rocky’ movies, ranked Tuesday 2:50 PM
- Everything you need to know about the Facebook conservative bias report Tuesday 2:35 PM
- Study links emoji use to more sex Tuesday 2:10 PM
- The chicken sandwich war is in full throttle on Twitter Tuesday 1:47 PM
- Netflix’s ‘Sextuplets’ proves Marlon Wayans is no Eddie Murphy—or even Mike Myers Tuesday 1:31 PM
- Facebook is finally rolling out its clear history tool Tuesday 1:13 PM
- ‘Theater etiquette’ tweets surge after YouTuber cast in ‘Waitress’ Tuesday 12:55 PM
The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, was brought on by the American Cable Association, CTIA–The Wireless Association, NCTA– The Internet & Television Association and USTelecom–The Broadband Association.
The groups represent several major internet service providers (ISPs) including AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Comcast, Sprint, and others, according to Ars Technica.
The lawsuit alleges California’s net neutrality law—which was heralded by advocates as the “gold standard” for states looking to enact their own protections in light of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rescinding net neutrality laws nation-wide last year—is a “classic example of unconstitutional state regulation.”
“This statute was purposefully intended to countermand and undermine federal law by imposing on bias the very same regulations that the [FCC] expressly repealed in its 2018 Restoring Internet Freedom Order,” the suit reads.
The suit argues that California’s law is preempted under the Constitution. (Read the full lawsuit here.)
Meanwhile, net neutrality advocates said the latest lawsuit was evidence that the repeal of net neutrality by the FCC last year was done for the benefit of ISPs.
“Big telecom companies hate the California net neutrality bill because it prevents them from screwing over their customers more than they already do,” Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement. “It’s no surprise that they’re suing, but it does make it even more blatant and clear that Jeff Sessions and Ajit Pai are working directly on behalf of Big Cable in trying to block basic consumer protection legislation that passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.”
The lawsuit from the telecom groups comes on the heels of the Justice Department announcing its own lawsuit against California over the state’s net neutrality law.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions called the law “illegal” and argued that California could not regulate interstate commerce.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).