- Bernie or Barry? Garth Brooks’ Sanders jersey sparks online panic 4 Years Ago
- Netflix series ‘Followers’ is a visual treat—but lacks a clear narrative Today 6:00 AM
- Influencer got trapped under ice for TikTok clout, ‘came close to dying’ Thursday 7:59 PM
- #BernieBruh puts new spin on ‘Bernie Bro’ label, showcases support among Black voters Thursday 6:58 PM
- Camila María Concepcíon, trans activist and Netflix writer, dies at 28 Thursday 5:46 PM
- Chrissy Teigen calls out fan who made weird comment about her daughter’s feet Thursday 4:57 PM
- TikTok’s ‘clean queen’ says videos are helping her figure out ‘adulting’ Thursday 4:12 PM
- Clearview clients include ICE, Macy’s, Best Buy, leaked data reveals Thursday 4:08 PM
- Women are clamoring to get their photos on a Twitter feed of ‘hot mugshots’ Thursday 4:06 PM
- ‘Love Is Blind’ finale: Somehow, real love emerged from this dystopian setting Thursday 3:57 PM
- Creator of ‘Say So’ TikTok dance appears in Doja Cat music video Thursday 3:51 PM
- Is TikTok’s algorithm actually pretty racist? Thursday 3:45 PM
- Fans freaking out over ‘Say My Name’ horror remix featured in Jordan Peele’s ‘Candyman’ Thursday 3:33 PM
- CDC graphic warns most facial hair isn’t compatible with coronavirus protection measures Thursday 1:31 PM
- Tutoring website refuses to take down ad sexualizing Asian women Thursday 1:24 PM
FCC fines Verizon $1.35 million for net-neutrality-violating ‘supercookies’
This kind of tracking violates net neutrality, according to the government.
Verizon Wireless will pay a $1.35 million fine for tracking customer behavior with so-called “supercookies.”
The wireless company inserted this tracking code into its customers’ browsing sessions without their knowledge or consent. The cookies then allowed Verizon and third parties to target customers with advertisements as they browsed the Web.
The Federal Communications Commission, which opened an enforcement action against Verizon for the practice, settled with the telecom firm on Monday. The commission declared that the secret use of supercookies violated the transparency provisions of the net neutrality rules it adopted last February.
“Consumers care about privacy and should have a say in how their personal information is used, especially when it comes to who knows what they’re doing online,” Travis LeBlanc, head of the FCC‘s enforcement bureau, said in a statement. “Privacy and innovation are not incompatible. This agreement shows that companies can offer meaningful transparency and consumer choice while at the same time continuing to innovate.”
Supercookies have become controversial in recent years because they allow companies to track users even after the user switches to private browsing mode. The tracking code uses ad impressions to connect people between private and non-private sessions.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the settlement “a great victory for everyone who uses the Internet.”
Peter Micek, global policy counsel at Access Now, a consumer privacy advocacy group, called the settlement “a clear win for user rights.”
“This sets a positive precedent against insidious online tracking, which is occurring across the globe,” Micek said in a statement. “We expect regulators worldwide, from the European Union to India, to follow the FCC’s lead, and for other telcos to take notice.”
The FCC touted the fine as its second major open-Internet enforcement action since the adoption of the net neutrality rules. The agency fined AT&T $100 million in 2015 for misleading customers about its unlimited data plans.
Photo via Mike Mozart/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Once named one of Forbes’ 20 Under 20 and hired as a staff writer for the Daily Dot when he was still a senior in high school, William Turton is a rising tech reporter focusing on information security, hacking culture, and politics. Since leaving the Daily Dot in April 2016, his work has appeared on Gizmodo, the Outline, and Vice News Tonight on HBO.