- Here’s what’s coming to Amazon Prime in June 4 Years Ago
- Where did Jon Snow go? Unpacking the ‘Game of Thrones’ ending 4 Years Ago
- So, did anyone actually win ‘Game of Thrones’? 4 Years Ago
- The surprising religious subtext of ‘John Wick: Chapter 3’ Today 12:53 PM
- Robin Arryn got hot—and the internet is seriously shook Today 12:40 PM
- Tana Mongeau is going to VidCon a year after TanaCon disaster Today 12:12 PM
- What have 2020 Democrats said about Alabama’s abortion ban? Today 11:36 AM
- People keep throwing milkshakes at the U.K.’s far-right politicians Today 11:10 AM
- James Charles is rebounding from his YouTube scandal—and his mentor is paying the price Today 10:42 AM
- Conservatives accuse Pete Buttigieg of wanting to tear down Jefferson Memorial Today 10:28 AM
- Graduating Moorehouse students thank billionaire for vowing to pay off $40m in student debt Today 10:22 AM
- ‘Westworld’ season 3 trailer gives us a new world, Aaron Paul Today 10:17 AM
- Twitch streamer says she’s receiving backlash for ‘getting men banned’ Today 9:27 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ fulfilled a twisted version of its biggest prophecy Today 8:17 AM
- Minions memes are more popular than the far-right on Telegram Today 7:35 AM
FCC slaps AT&T with $100-million fine for lying about ‘unlimited’ data plans
What exactly did AT&T think ‘unlimited’ means?
If you’re an AT&T customer who thought your “unlimited” data plan’s “maximum” plan wasn’t really performing, you’re probably right. The Federal Communication Commission is suing the telecommunications giant for a whopping $100 million for misleading customers about their service.
AT&T, the FCC claims, systematically implemented a “Maximum Bit Rate” policy on customers who had unlimited data usage, which somewhat hurts a company’s ability to truthfully claim their data policy is unlimited. Under the policy, customers who reached a certain data cap each month would see their Internet data speeds slow by “orders of magnitude,” according to court filings.
In a statement, AT&T partially rebuffed the charges, saying, “We have been fully transparent with our customers, providing notice in multiple ways and going well beyond the FCC’s disclosure requirements.” But in a press call, a senior FCC official described AT&T’s attempts to disclose their data caps as inaccurate and incomplete.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a completely unrelated, but similarly massive, charge against AT&T. In early April, the two parties settled for $25 million over loose security at AT&T’s third-party customer service centers, resulting in the theft of nearly 300,000 customers’ data.
Photo via Jericho/Wikipedia (CC BY 3.0) | Remix by Fernando Alfonso III
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.