- Why is Yennefer of Vengerberg so different in Netflix’s ‘The Witcher’? 5 Years Ago
- Actress slammed for ‘acid attack-face’ TikTok challenge 5 Years Ago
- ‘Weathering With You’ blends fantasy and realism in a magical love story Saturday 6:18 PM
- Kidnapped teen used Snapchat to get rescued Saturday 4:35 PM
- What fans do and don’t want to see in future ‘Far Cry’ installments Saturday 4:26 PM
- Aaron Carter accused of stealing lion art for merch Saturday 3:10 PM
- Instagram’s hidden like counts were inspired by a ‘Black Mirror’ episode Saturday 2:06 PM
- Student says they were expelled for tricking teacher into making inappropriate TikTok Saturday 12:26 PM
- Space Force uniforms relentlessly mocked, memed Saturday 10:52 AM
- Man flamed after admitting he called police on Target employee over a toothbrush Saturday 9:10 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Vivir Dos Veces’ searches for a last chance at first love Saturday 8:00 AM
- Camila Cabello must do more about her racist history Saturday 6:00 AM
- Instagram and Facebook are reportedly blocking queer ads Friday 8:58 PM
- Review: Tyler Perry’s ‘A Fall From Grace’ is both nonsensical and utterly predictable Friday 6:48 PM
- Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? Friday 6:05 PM
FCC slaps AT&T with $100-million fine for lying about ‘unlimited’ data plans
What exactly did AT&T think ‘unlimited’ means?
If you’re an AT&T customer who thought your “unlimited” data plan’s “maximum” plan wasn’t really performing, you’re probably right. The Federal Communication Commission is suing the telecommunications giant for a whopping $100 million for misleading customers about their service.
AT&T, the FCC claims, systematically implemented a “Maximum Bit Rate” policy on customers who had unlimited data usage, which somewhat hurts a company’s ability to truthfully claim their data policy is unlimited. Under the policy, customers who reached a certain data cap each month would see their Internet data speeds slow by “orders of magnitude,” according to court filings.
In a statement, AT&T partially rebuffed the charges, saying, “We have been fully transparent with our customers, providing notice in multiple ways and going well beyond the FCC’s disclosure requirements.” But in a press call, a senior FCC official described AT&T’s attempts to disclose their data caps as inaccurate and incomplete.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a completely unrelated, but similarly massive, charge against AT&T. In early April, the two parties settled for $25 million over loose security at AT&T’s third-party customer service centers, resulting in the theft of nearly 300,000 customers’ data.
Photo via Jericho/Wikipedia (CC BY 3.0) | Remix by Fernando Alfonso III
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.