- The Economist faces blowback for asking if trans people should be sterilized 4 Years Ago
- 8 doormats that we can’t believe actually exist 4 Years Ago
- Why is political blog the Hill publishing work by anti-LGBTQ hate groups? 4 Years Ago
- A woman vice president? The 2020 men have some thoughts 4 Years Ago
- 80 percent of Americans support reinstating net neutrality Today 8:38 AM
- Website secretly filmed 1,600 hotel guests for fetish live stream Today 8:18 AM
- The Holga 120N is the $40 camera you never knew you needed Today 8:13 AM
- Poster for ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’ gets mercilessly roasted Today 7:18 AM
- How to steam March Madness 2019 for free Today 7:00 AM
- Trump maintains attack on late John McCain Today 6:51 AM
- How to know if someone blocked you on Snapchat Today 6:30 AM
- Drag queens are calling on DirecTV to keep Viacom channels Today 6:16 AM
- Daniel Caesar dons cape for whiteness—and gets canceled Wednesday 4:29 PM
- Triton is a new malware ‘deliberately’ designed to put lives at risk Wednesday 3:23 PM
- ‘Into the Dark: I’m Just F*cking with You’ is one of the series’ best Wednesday 1:54 PM
FCC slaps AT&T with $100-million fine for lying about ‘unlimited’ data plans
What exactly did AT&T think ‘unlimited’ means?
If you’re an AT&T customer who thought your “unlimited” data plan’s “maximum” plan wasn’t really performing, you’re probably right. The Federal Communication Commission is suing the telecommunications giant for a whopping $100 million for misleading customers about their service.
AT&T, the FCC claims, systematically implemented a “Maximum Bit Rate” policy on customers who had unlimited data usage, which somewhat hurts a company’s ability to truthfully claim their data policy is unlimited. Under the policy, customers who reached a certain data cap each month would see their Internet data speeds slow by “orders of magnitude,” according to court filings.
In a statement, AT&T partially rebuffed the charges, saying, “We have been fully transparent with our customers, providing notice in multiple ways and going well beyond the FCC’s disclosure requirements.” But in a press call, a senior FCC official described AT&T’s attempts to disclose their data caps as inaccurate and incomplete.
The lawsuit comes on the heels of a completely unrelated, but similarly massive, charge against AT&T. In early April, the two parties settled for $25 million over loose security at AT&T’s third-party customer service centers, resulting in the theft of nearly 300,000 customers’ data.
Photo via Jericho/Wikipedia (CC BY 3.0) | Remix by Fernando Alfonso III
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.