- People on Twitter ask whose ancestors would’ve passed immigrant ‘wealth test’ Monday 6:54 PM
- Kobe Bryant helicopter crash mocked in teen’s TikTok video Monday 6:38 PM
- Chiefs, Bears, Packers have Twitter accounts hacked Monday 3:48 PM
- Washington Post reporter suspended amid backlash over Kobe Bryant tweet Monday 3:08 PM
- America is united in hating Ken Starr’s impeachment hat Monday 3:01 PM
- In ‘Cuties,’ the contradictions of growing up come to a head Monday 1:55 PM
- Racist tweets blame fruit bat soup for coronavirus Monday 1:25 PM
- What is the #ILeftTheGOP movement? Monday 1:21 PM
- The Grammys were weird and sad—but the Billy Porter hat memes offered some levity Monday 12:36 PM
- Auschwitz Museum calls on Facebook to ban Holocaust denialism Monday 11:59 AM
- YouTuber who said his girlfriend was dead now says he faked it Monday 11:42 AM
- Review: Kentucky Route Zero is one of the most magical games ever made Monday 11:00 AM
- Backlash grows against Clearview as lawsuit looms Monday 10:58 AM
- Tyler the Creator calls out the Grammys for racism over ‘Rap Album’ win Monday 10:25 AM
- Democrats call on John Bolton to testify after book bombshell Monday 9:56 AM
Jeremy Corbell’s awful misfire of a documentary, Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers, ventures to examine a dubious character in Bob Lazar, a self-described “scientist” who in 1989 claimed to have worked near Area 51, investigating alien tech that the United States was supposedly hiding from the public. Lazar has since become a totem for UFO enthusiasts and space-related conspiracy theorists, and Corbell believes that talking to him one more time might uncover the truth. The problem is, the director pursues the wrong enigmas, answering unnecessary questions that no one’s asked.
DIRECTOR: Jeremy Corbell
Jeremy Cordell fails to find a sliver of truth in his documentary about self-described “scientist” Bob Lazar, who revealed “information” about extraterrestrial technology at Area 51 in 1989.
Among other things, Lazar claims to have worked at a U.S. government site named S-4, near Papoose Lake in Nevada, on reverse engineering extraterrestrial aircraft that used gravity wave propulsion. Per Lazar, these aircraft are powered by a stable version of element 115, or Moscovium, which had yet to be officially discovered when he made his claims.
Of course, Lazar’s claims have been largely dismissed and relegated to fantastic film and TV concepts. Though Corbell produces enough evidence to show that Lazar did work for the government in some capacity around Area 51, the institutions from which Lazar says he graduated show no records of attendance. His 1990 felony conviction, in connection with a prostitution ring, further sullied his name. It wasn’t until former Pentagon official Luis Elizondo recently admitted his belief in extraterrestrial life that UFO activity even seemed plausible and acknowledged as newsworthy in the mainstream.
There hasn’t been a specific reason to doubt Lazar’s claims, but not once has he produced a shred of hard proof. This makes his exasperation with the public’s non-belief unusual. For the little it’s worth, many of the investigators and newspeople interviewed in the doc believe Lazar. So does Corbell, which proves problematic for his duty to find facts.
Corbell essentially rehashes all of this information, with new interviews featuring Lazar, a handful of friends, his wife, and other associates, including Las Vegas newsman and leading UFO adherent George Knapp. Yet at no point does the film introduce any new ideas or evidence, instead becoming an odd character study of a man no one’s asked about. Instead of following up on Elizondo’s explosive new claims, Corbell seems resolute in simply staring down Lazar in front of different backgrounds with ominous music, questioning whether he’s “sure or sure-sure” about what he said 30 years ago.
Even worse, Corbell never digs directly into Lazar’s claims. His failure to locate any sort of authenticity proves to be the film’s worst feature, of many. For whatever reason, Corbell also employs actor Mickey Rourke to deliver a comically dramatic performance as the film’s existentialist narrator, on top of Space Age/UFO archival footage. These attempts at disorientation are completely nonsensical, unrelated to literally anything that makes up the meat of the documentary.
In all, Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers is a flop. Corbell fails to find anything honest over its course, even when presented a grand opportunity, time, and place to do so.
Looking for something more specific? Here are our Netflix guides for the best war movies, documentaries, anime, indie flicks, true crime, food shows, rom-coms, LGBT movies, alien movies, gangster movies, Westerns, film noir, and movies based on true stories streaming right now. There are also sad movies guaranteed to make you cry, weird movies to melt your brain, old movies when you need something classic, and standup specials when you really need to laugh. Or check out Flixable, a search engine for Netflix.
Kahron Spearman is a music and film critic whose work can also regularly be regularly found in the Austin Chronicle.