- How to stream Real Madrid vs. Real Valladolid Friday 10:44 PM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Arsenal Friday 10:28 PM
- How to stream Manchester United vs. Crystal Palace Friday 10:05 PM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Norwich City Friday 8:55 PM
- How to stream the 2019-20 Serie A season Friday 8:05 PM
- Tom Brady keeps supplying us with new meme material Friday 5:55 PM
- Emails reveal Facebook’s knowledge of Cambridge Analytica Friday 3:43 PM
- ‘Fast and Furious’ + ‘American Ninja Warrior’ = Netflix’s ‘Hyperdrive’ Friday 3:15 PM
- Trump jokes drop in Dow is because Seth Moulton dropped out of 2020 race Friday 3:13 PM
- What we learned when we visited Mr. B, America’s chonkiest cat Friday 1:46 PM
- Trump’s new plan to fight opioid overdose? This tweet Friday 1:06 PM
- Fitness influencer shamed for ‘sharing numbers’ in weight loss posts Friday 1:04 PM
- The VSCO Girl has always been here Friday 1:01 PM
- Tomi Lahren’s new ‘Freedom’ clothing line is made for meme mockery Friday 12:21 PM
- Taylor Swift’s ‘London Boy’ is a bop, but Brits don’t think her lyrics are accurate Friday 12:02 PM
New Zealand won’t face charges for spying on Kim Dotcom, 85 others
New Zealand’s GCSB illegally spied, but it didn’t intend to break any laws.
That agency, the Government Communication Security Bureau, also won’t be charged for intercepting Dotcom’s communications, even though a court found that action illegal.
Dotcom is currently wanted by the U.S. on copyright infringement and money laundering charges, stemming from his ownership and operation of his former site MegaUpload. New Zealand police raided his mansion in 2012, though a court later declared the raid itself was retroactively illegal, too.
Peter Read, the Detective Superintendent investigating the claims, announced Thursday that the GCSB, the equivalent of the U.S.’s National Security Agency, would face “no criminal charges.”
Read admitted that “GCSB staff did commit the prohibited act,” of violating Section 216b of New Zealand’s Crimes Act, which outlaws “intentionally intercept[ing] any private communication by means of an interception device.”
But that wasn’t enough for a case. “They did not have the necessary intent to satisfy the elements of the offense and be criminally liable,” he said, though he didn’t elaborate on how the investigation determined GCSB’s intent.
The world learned a week before that an affidavit in Dotcom’s case shows that GCSB obtained information on Dotcom’s Internet activity, possibly through the NSA‘s XKeyscore Internet surveillance program. Much of the affidavit was redacted, but Dotcom’s Internet protocol (IP) address and email aliases are plainly visible.
Dotcom, of course, is unimpressed with the decision.
Photo of GCSB facility via Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.