- Reddit Relationships: Man laughs at girlfriend for using Microsoft PowerPoint during sex Thursday 8:59 PM
- The 15 Brad Pitt movies you need to see now, ranked Thursday 8:26 PM
- Facebook could face legal action over the Area 51 event Thursday 6:50 PM
- How to stream Texans vs. Chargers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 6:40 PM
- Tekashi 69 alleges Cardi B was a Bloods gang member Thursday 5:55 PM
- Right-wing sites falsely claimed group of Somalis attacked man in viral video Thursday 5:00 PM
- Big creators risk losing checkmarks amid YouTube verification purge Thursday 4:56 PM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Lions in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:52 PM
- How to stream Steelers vs. 49ers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:10 PM
- How to stream Bills vs. Bengals in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:03 PM
- Colt halts production of AR-15s for civilians Thursday 3:45 PM
- If you love long-winded, hashtag-heavy Instagram captions, these apps can help Thursday 2:54 PM
- Teen girls on TikTok have convinced the internet that they eat their tampons Thursday 2:33 PM
- Twitch streamer faces criticism for trying to defend racist jokes Thursday 2:03 PM
- How to stream Raiders vs. Vikings in Week 3 Thursday 12:55 PM
New Zealand won’t face charges for spying on Kim Dotcom, 85 others
New Zealand’s GCSB illegally spied, but it didn’t intend to break any laws.
That agency, the Government Communication Security Bureau, also won’t be charged for intercepting Dotcom’s communications, even though a court found that action illegal.
Dotcom is currently wanted by the U.S. on copyright infringement and money laundering charges, stemming from his ownership and operation of his former site MegaUpload. New Zealand police raided his mansion in 2012, though a court later declared the raid itself was retroactively illegal, too.
Peter Read, the Detective Superintendent investigating the claims, announced Thursday that the GCSB, the equivalent of the U.S.’s National Security Agency, would face “no criminal charges.”
Read admitted that “GCSB staff did commit the prohibited act,” of violating Section 216b of New Zealand’s Crimes Act, which outlaws “intentionally intercept[ing] any private communication by means of an interception device.”
But that wasn’t enough for a case. “They did not have the necessary intent to satisfy the elements of the offense and be criminally liable,” he said, though he didn’t elaborate on how the investigation determined GCSB’s intent.
The world learned a week before that an affidavit in Dotcom’s case shows that GCSB obtained information on Dotcom’s Internet activity, possibly through the NSA‘s XKeyscore Internet surveillance program. Much of the affidavit was redacted, but Dotcom’s Internet protocol (IP) address and email aliases are plainly visible.
Dotcom, of course, is unimpressed with the decision.
Photo of GCSB facility via Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.