- ‘Atlantics’ tells a ghost story steeped with emotion and realism 3 Years Ago
- ‘Jojo Rabbit’ is a sweet, singular movie that loses its grip on satire 3 Years Ago
- Jordan Peterson is in rehab for Klonopin addiction 3 Years Ago
- The cat-worshipping turkey cult video, explained 3 Years Ago
- Despite legal threats and drama, the Area 51 desert event is on Today 3:05 PM
- How to stream Yair Rodriguez vs. Jeremy Stephens on UFC Fight Night Today 3:00 PM
- Twitter just launched its ‘Hide Replies’ feature Today 1:59 PM
- How to turn off image metadata before it snitches on you Today 1:36 PM
- The ‘Breaking Bad’ movie is coming to theaters—for one weekend only Today 1:04 PM
- Teens recorded, shared videos of mall fight that ended in fatal stabbing Today 12:44 PM
- How to stream Giants vs. Buccaneers in Week 3 Today 12:31 PM
- Report: Ben Carson made transphobic comments at HUD meeting Today 12:30 PM
- Where to buy the Switch Lite and everything else you need to know Today 12:28 PM
- Facebook is experimenting with apps targeting teens Today 12:21 PM
- #LiveFromTheArea51Raid: Memes and highlights from the desert Today 12:06 PM
The two House committees that have teamed up to study encryption offered a few more details on Thursday about their politically and technologically fraught work.
Lawmakers from the Judiciary Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee will spend “the next several months” meeting with law-enforcement officials, tech companies, trade groups, civil-liberties organizations, legal experts, academics, and security engineers, and will receive “technical briefings on encryption,” the group said in a statement.
The congressional working group is a response to a growing debate about the role of encryption in public life, as law-enforcement and intelligence officials push for limits on the strength of digital security over concerns that criminals and terrorists are using it to hide their activities.
Technologists, Silicon Valley executives, and privacy advocates have staunchly resisted these attempts to weaken encryption by requiring tech companies to insert so-called “backdoors” that let them comply with warrants. They argue that undermining encryption will endanger vastly more people than it helps; push customers to unregulated foreign encrypted platforms; and embolden repressive regimes to demand similar access to user data.
Tensions over encryption came to a head recently when the U.S. government battled Apple over the locked iPhone of a dead terrorist. In response to the high-stakes legal drama, Congress held several hearings on encryption, bringing in Apple‘s top lawyer, the FBI director, local law-enforcement agents, and security experts.
The initial announcement of the group followed the introduction of a bill to create a digital-security commission, composed of outside experts, to study encryption and related issues. The leaders of the Judiciary and Commerce committees have said that lawmakers, not outsiders, should take the lead role in studying these complicated subjects.
“The roadmap adopted by the encryption working group this week paves the path toward identifying solutions to the ongoing national debate surrounding encryption,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), and respective committee ranking members John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said in their statement.
Several of the working group’s members are staunch privacy advocates who have roundly rejected backdoors on many occasions, including Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), and Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), another member, co-sponsored the controversial Patriot Act after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, but later said he regretted introducing that sweeping counterterrorism bill and has advocated surveillance reforms and defended encryption.
“Members of the working group agree that encryption is a critical tool for protecting Americans’ privacy and security and that private industry must continue to increase its effectiveness,” the four committee lawmakers said. “However, challenges remain for law enforcement seeking to protect the American people from criminals and terrorists. We look forward to continuing our work on this important issue.”
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.