- More than 40 colleges say they won’t use facial recognition on campus 3 Months Ago
- LeBron’s Instagram tribute to Kobe is devastating Today 7:56 AM
- ‘Rise of Empires: Ottoman’ is ‘Game of Thrones’ for history buffs Today 7:00 AM
- People on Twitter ask whose ancestors would’ve passed immigrant ‘wealth test’ Monday 6:54 PM
- Kobe Bryant helicopter crash mocked in teen’s TikTok video Monday 6:38 PM
- Chiefs, Bears, Packers have Twitter accounts hacked Monday 3:48 PM
- Washington Post reporter suspended amid backlash over Kobe Bryant tweet Monday 3:08 PM
- America is united in hating Ken Starr’s impeachment hat Monday 3:01 PM
- In ‘Cuties,’ the contradictions of growing up come to a head Monday 1:55 PM
- Racist tweets blame fruit bat soup for coronavirus Monday 1:25 PM
- What is the #ILeftTheGOP movement? Monday 1:21 PM
- The Grammys were weird and sad—but the Billy Porter hat memes offered some levity Monday 12:36 PM
- Auschwitz Museum calls on Facebook to ban Holocaust denialism Monday 11:59 AM
- YouTuber who said his girlfriend was dead now says he faked it Monday 11:42 AM
- Review: Kentucky Route Zero is one of the most magical games ever made Monday 11:00 AM
Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), a frequent voice on the Republican side of the net neutrality debate in Congress, announced on Monday that he will not seek reelection.
Walden, the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, was vocal in his opposition to the use of Title II of the Communications Act as a backbone for net neutrality rules. The Title II issue is a major sticking point between Democrats and Republicans in Congress regarding net neutrality legislation.
Earlier this year when the House of Representatives passed the Save the Internet Act, a bill that would essentially undo the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) repeal of the 2015 Open Internet Order, Walden repeatedly pushed against it, at one point claiming Title II was “not necessary to preserve a free and open internet.”
Around the same time, the Oregon lawmaker wrote an op-ed for Fox News where he argued that a net neutrality bill needed to be “bipartisan,” and argued that he agreed in broad strokes with not allowing internet traffic to be blocked or throttled or having internet service providers engage in paid prioritization. However, he insisted Title II would give the FCC “unbridled regulatory authority.”
Democrats and net neutrality advocates have argued that Title II is the best legal foundation for solidifying the rules.
In the op-ed, Walden and other colleagues pushed for a series of Republican-backed bills that were offered around the same time as the Save the Internet Act.
The Save the Internet Act passed in the House of Representatives in April but has since languished in the Senate, despite efforts by some lawmakers to force a vote on the bill.
Following the court decision from the United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit, which mostly upheld the FCC’s repeal but also threw out a portion that blocked states from crafting their own bills, Walden once again called for Congress to “come together” and work on bipartisan legislation.
Walden, in a statement to Politico, said he plans on closing “the public service chapter of my life,” and that it was time for him “to pursue new challenges and opportunities.”
- ‘After Net Neutrality’ book explores history, activism and offers an idea for the future
- Ajit Pai is unhappy states are bucking his agency’s net neutrality repeal
- Will states create the federal net neutrality standard?
- Net neutrality advocates say to remain wary of ‘bad legislation’ in wake of court’s decision
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).