- Why did the Israeli military tweet this thirst trap? Today 10:43 AM
- Jake Paul wants you to have financial freedom… by paying him a monthly fee Today 10:40 AM
- Tweets from Sanders supporters are terrifying the establishment Today 10:15 AM
- Zuckerberg says he supports 1 bill in Congress that would regulate Facebook Today 10:11 AM
- Uncanny ‘Back to the Future’ deepfake transports Tom Holland and Robert Downey, Jr. to 1985 Today 10:04 AM
- Everyone is doing the Renegade. Including the teen who started it Today 9:23 AM
- Reality Winner is asking for clemency—will she get it? Today 7:59 AM
- There’s a Baby Yoda mod for ‘Star Wars: Battlefront II’ Today 7:38 AM
- ‘Bachelor’ contestant apologizes for ‘White Lives Matter’ photo shoot Today 12:13 AM
- ‘Sonic The Hedgehog’ sets box office record for video game movies Sunday 8:15 PM
- Truck driver allegedly watching porn kills teen driver in a car crash Sunday 6:44 PM
- Is the Buttigieg campaign behind this pro-Pete Nigerian Twitter account? Sunday 4:58 PM
- Mask that has your face printed on it allows you to unlock your phone during viral epidemics Sunday 3:52 PM
- Justin Bieber slid into the DMs of someone who hated his new album Sunday 1:05 PM
- HQ Trivia host and co-founder in Twitter feud amid shutdown Sunday 12:10 PM
British spies can no longer be sued for computer hacking
If you don’t have anything to hide, you shouldn’t be allowed to sue when they pry.
Spies at the U.K.’s intelligence agency are now immune from prosecution related to computer hacking after the British parliament secretly changed a key computer-crimes statute.
The rewriting of the law, which protects the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), took place effectively in secret while the group Privacy International pursued a legal case against GCHQ. Privacy International was notified of the change last week.
How secret was the change? The crucial clause of the Computer Misuse Act that was rewritten to exempt all law enforcement officers from prosecution was misleadingly titled “savings,” despite having wide consequences beyond financial matters.
The specifics of the new law are not yet known.
“It appears no NGOs, Regulators, RIPA Commissioners, the Information Commissioners Office, Industry, or the public were notified or consulted about the proposed legislative changes,” Privacy International said in a statement. “There was no published Privacy Impact Assessment.”
The U.K.’s national police agencies were consulted, but “there was no public debate,” the group continued.
Eric King, Privacy International’s deputy director, said the secret rule change reflected the “underhand[ed] and undemocratic manner in which the government is seeking to make lawful GCHQ’s hacking operations.”
The British government pushed back on the idea that secret changes to the law would affect GCHQ’s operations.
“There have been no changes made to the Computer Misuse Act 1990 by the Serious Crime Act 2015 that increase or expand the ability of the intelligence agencies to carry out lawful cyber crime investigation,” a spokesperson for the U.K.’s Home Office told the Register. “It would be inappropriate to comment further while proceedings are ongoing.”
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.