- The internet is mocking Robert Mueller’s report deadline Friday 7:53 PM
- Instagram blocks some anti-vax hashtags—but still has far to go Friday 6:20 PM
- Study: Netflix released more originals than licensed titles last year Friday 2:26 PM
- Laura Ingraham, Dinesh D’Souza slam journalist for having a job Friday 1:40 PM
- Netflix is testing a cheap-as-hell mobile-only plan Friday 1:08 PM
- Astrology app Co-Star’s bizarre push notifications are now a meme Friday 12:18 PM
- ‘The Dirt’ offers a sanitized history of Mötley Crüe—but why? Friday 11:42 AM
- ‘The Dirt’ director Jeff Tremaine on Mötley Crüe’s long, difficult road to Netflix Friday 11:30 AM
- Here’s video of yet another alleged gunman looking for YouTuber Adam22 Friday 11:09 AM
- 12 mugs that are absolutely purr-fect for cat enthusiasts Friday 10:58 AM
- Jared Kushner used WhatsApp for official White House business Friday 10:50 AM
- Unsettled Tom memes are on the rise Friday 10:36 AM
- Trans student nominated for prom king told by administration to run for queen Friday 10:07 AM
- Trump turns on his favorite cable news network Friday 8:56 AM
- Skillshare is offering new users one month of premium for less than $1 Friday 8:34 AM
The next great partisan battle in Congress is upon us.
Encryption aids terrorists by giving them “a free zone by which to recruit, radicalize, plot, and plan” online, Michael Steinbach, assistant director of the FBI’s counter-terrorism division, argued in front of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Steinbach echoed FBI director James Comey’s calls to expand the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act in order to require access to encrypted mobile phone data in the same way that telecom carriers build legal wiretap capabilities into phone networks in the U.S.
“We’re not talking about large-scale surveillance techniques,” Steinbach said. “We’re not looking at going through a backdoor or being nefarious. We’re talking about going to the company and asking for their assistance.”
The congressional hearing was called “Terrorism Gone Viral.” On Tuesday, Apple’s Cook called “the battle over encryption” an “attack on our civil liberties.”
“Some in Washington are hoping to undermine the ability of ordinary citizens to encrypt their data,” Cook said. He elaborated:
If you put a key under the mat for the cops, a burglar can find it, too. Criminals are using every technology tool at their disposal to hack into people’s accounts. If they know there’s a key hidden somewhere, they won’t stop until they find it.
Removing encryption tools from our products altogether, as some in Washington would like us to do, would only hurt law-abiding citizens who rely on us to protect their data. The bad guys will still encrypt; it’s easy to do and readily available.
Expect this battle—known as “the new crypto wars”—to continue to pop up and heat up.
The FBI’s push for backdoors into encryption technology is continuously clashing with Silicon Valley’s resistance.
This is a conflict that only Congress can decide. After the congressional strife over surveillance in the Patriot Act, it seems clear that encryption could be the next acute partisan collision over technology in Washington, D.C.
Photo via Kevin Jaako/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.