- Network of fake news sites in Michigan appears to be right-wing propaganda effort Today 6:30 AM
- ‘BoJack Horseman’ hints at a brutal reckoning in its final season Today 5:30 AM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Slavia Praha in the Champions League Today 2:00 AM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Ajax in the Champions League Today 1:00 AM
- People are using #WheresLindsey to criticize Graham over Trump ‘lynching’ defense Tuesday 8:22 PM
- 2 Proud Boys sentenced to 4 years in prison for attacking antifa protesters Tuesday 7:20 PM
- Paul Joseph Watson is very upset by bartender serving beer with her butt Tuesday 6:24 PM
- Twitter developing a policy to combat deepfakes Tuesday 5:28 PM
- The Nate Diaz vs. Jorge Masvidal bout at UFC 244 is perfect for NYC and its fight mecca Tuesday 5:27 PM
- Alexis Bledel named most dangerous online celebrity Tuesday 5:02 PM
- Kylie Jenner trademarks ‘rise and shine’ after meme success Tuesday 4:50 PM
- ‘Watchmen’ website expands what you know about its alt-history Tuesday 4:31 PM
- Smoke ’em, pass ’em Week 8: Mark Walton szn Tuesday 4:26 PM
- Venmo’s first-ever credit card to launch in 2020 Tuesday 3:46 PM
- Wet Kylo Ren may turn everyone to the dark side Tuesday 3:15 PM
The problem with modern journalism lies in our perception of it
We all want the same thing. We all want quality journalism.
Yesterday, Facebook’s director of product, Mike Hudack, ranted about the current state of the media. He said what has been said a million times: Respected news outlets “are ghosts in a shell,” now filled with fluff and listicles. It’s no secret that news media was hit hard by the Internet. Newspaper layoffs often fill headlines (that are read online) and it’s hard to find unbiased reports. What Hudack fails to offer, though, is a solution to the problem, and that is because he fails to see the issue every organization encounters.
Gus Rancatore, owner of the famous Toscanini’s Ice Cream Company, once told me a trade secret. He spends a significant amount of his time creating unique and difficult flavors, but he always has chocolate and vanilla ice cream on the menu. Why? Because they account for the majority of his sales.
It’s the same reason book publishers sell trashy, grocery store shelf novels: They have to fund the good stuff somehow. Literary fiction is often a bad investment, but it’s important, so publishers find ways to support it.
Many people who responded to Hudack blame Facebook for the decline in quality, but it’s not that simple. People like vanilla. What’s wrong with that? Why can’t a website that does serious journalism also produce entertaining content? Even the New York Times is trying to balance both because—put simply—clicks pay. There’s a reason BuzzFeed currently has the money to hire twice as many people as the Washington Post.
Yes, it would be amazing if it were like the old days and everyone paid for a newspaper subscription. But that’s naïve. The Internet changed the way we value news and the media is trying to figure out how to adjust accordingly. Asking news organizations to stay unchanged is wrong and irresponsible. Not adjusting with the times is the very reason so many newspapers have already shuttered.
We all want the same thing. We all want quality journalism. The issue is that it’s impossible for most news organizations to fund the in-depth reporting without a few articles about how to properly clean jeans.
We have to change the way we value journalism. Like ice cream shops and book publishers, we should accept the fact that news outlets now need a side of fluff to pay for the meaty journalism we all desire.
E.A. Weiss is a former Senior Social Media Editor at the Daily Dot. Based in Vermont, he now works as the National Growth Editor at McClatchy.