- Meet ByteDance, the Chinese tech company behind TikTok 5 Years Ago
- Everything you need to know about investing app Robinhood 5 Years Ago
- How to stream 49ers vs. Seahawks on Monday Night Football Today 1:43 PM
- Cops cuff Black man for eating sandwich on subway platform Today 1:29 PM
- Drake booed offstage by Frank Ocean fans Today 1:17 PM
- Trump says he’s meeting with vaping industry as administration readies new rules Today 12:42 PM
- Everything you need to know about Google Reverse Image Search Today 12:29 PM
- Hong Kong police caught on live stream shooting protester Today 12:26 PM
- Twitter proposes adding warnings to tweets with deepfakes Today 10:43 AM
- Dak Prescott’s pregame warmup becomes an instant meme Today 10:40 AM
- lhan Omar baselessly accused of anti-Semitism for billionaires tweet Today 10:15 AM
- Tulsi Gabbard wants Hillary Clinton to retract her Russia accusations Today 9:24 AM
- 21 stoner gift ideas that don’t involve buying weed Today 9:13 AM
- PayPal and Venmo’s anti-terrorism regulations are causing headaches for average businesses Today 9:06 AM
- Consumers claim the Apple Card is sexist Today 8:44 AM
The problem with modern journalism lies in our perception of it
We all want the same thing. We all want quality journalism.
Yesterday, Facebook’s director of product, Mike Hudack, ranted about the current state of the media. He said what has been said a million times: Respected news outlets “are ghosts in a shell,” now filled with fluff and listicles. It’s no secret that news media was hit hard by the Internet. Newspaper layoffs often fill headlines (that are read online) and it’s hard to find unbiased reports. What Hudack fails to offer, though, is a solution to the problem, and that is because he fails to see the issue every organization encounters.
Gus Rancatore, owner of the famous Toscanini’s Ice Cream Company, once told me a trade secret. He spends a significant amount of his time creating unique and difficult flavors, but he always has chocolate and vanilla ice cream on the menu. Why? Because they account for the majority of his sales.
It’s the same reason book publishers sell trashy, grocery store shelf novels: They have to fund the good stuff somehow. Literary fiction is often a bad investment, but it’s important, so publishers find ways to support it.
Many people who responded to Hudack blame Facebook for the decline in quality, but it’s not that simple. People like vanilla. What’s wrong with that? Why can’t a website that does serious journalism also produce entertaining content? Even the New York Times is trying to balance both because—put simply—clicks pay. There’s a reason BuzzFeed currently has the money to hire twice as many people as the Washington Post.
Yes, it would be amazing if it were like the old days and everyone paid for a newspaper subscription. But that’s naïve. The Internet changed the way we value news and the media is trying to figure out how to adjust accordingly. Asking news organizations to stay unchanged is wrong and irresponsible. Not adjusting with the times is the very reason so many newspapers have already shuttered.
We all want the same thing. We all want quality journalism. The issue is that it’s impossible for most news organizations to fund the in-depth reporting without a few articles about how to properly clean jeans.
We have to change the way we value journalism. Like ice cream shops and book publishers, we should accept the fact that news outlets now need a side of fluff to pay for the meaty journalism we all desire.
E.A. Weiss is a former Senior Social Media Editor at the Daily Dot. Based in Vermont, he now works as the National Growth Editor at McClatchy.