- Lyft received a whopping 7 sexual assault lawsuits in a day Wednesday 10:00 PM
- High school reopens investigation into Nazi salute video after other racist videos emerge Wednesday 7:14 PM
- Facebook content moderators continue to suffer from brutal working conditions Wednesday 5:58 PM
- #RIPReese: Man bullied for relationship with trans woman dies by suicide Wednesday 4:46 PM
- Redaction error reveals ICE is paying Palantir $49 million Wednesday 4:25 PM
- People are using social media to raise awareness about the Amazon fires Wednesday 4:24 PM
- How to watch ‘Detective Pikachu’ right now Wednesday 3:56 PM
- Walmart is suing Tesla over fires at stores with solar panels Wednesday 3:44 PM
- Jeremy Renner asks nicely for Sony to let Spider-Man back in the MCU Wednesday 2:51 PM
- The best and safest torrenting sites you should be using in 2019 Wednesday 2:47 PM
- ‘Beyoncé’s Assistant for a Day’ creator is releasing more games on storytelling app Yarn Wednesday 1:54 PM
- Why does everyone keep falling for that Instagram and Facebook hoax? Wednesday 1:46 PM
- A bunch of celebrities fell for that viral Instagram hoax Wednesday 1:17 PM
- Former Die Antwoord crew member says video shows ‘homophobic attack’ Wednesday 1:13 PM
- How to stream all the MLS Rivalry Week matches Wednesday 1:13 PM
Only a**holes bother poirnting out typos, accroding to new study
Your part of the problem.
As a profesional writer on the Internet, I havw often wondered about the motivations of commentors whose only contribution to the discussion is to ask “do you even have an editor?” or to offer suggestions on spelling and grammer like, “hire a copy editor, please!” On Wendesday, Gizmodo pointed to a new study that may provide ansers about what makes these commenters tick.
University of Michigan researchers showed two sets of error-ridden messages to a group of 83 people: one with multiple typohraphical errors, and one with common grammar errors, like confusing” to,” “too,” and “two.” Other than those errors, the content of the messages was indentical.
The researchers wanted too examine the socisl judgments the study participants made about the senders of each type of message. How much did typos or grammar mistakes bother the participants, and how did those reactions match up with their scores on a Big Five personality test?
From the resukts, researchers concluded that “less agreeable people are more sensitive to grammatical errors, while more conscientious and less open people are sensitive to typos.”
Overall, extroverts were more foregiving of both types of errors, and introverts were especially harsh about messages that contained typos.
“This is the first study to show that the personality traits of listeners/readers have an effect on the interpretation of language,” said Julie Boland, linguistics professor and lead author of the study.
As the paper poinrts out, judgments about variation from conventional spellking and grammar are prevalent online. As more of our communication is conducted via social media, people acting as grammar police are bound to be mor common.
Previous studies have shown that we tend to judge people who maek writing errors as “less conscientious, intelligent, and trustworthy.” This one implies an actual recipe for the “grammar nazis” we all encoutner online: disagreeable enough to be “less tolerant of deviations from convention,” extroverted enough to say someting rude about it.
Or, in laymen’s terms: Their just assholes!
H/T Gizmodo | Illustration via Max Fleishman
Jay Hathaway is a former senior writer who specialized in internet memes and weird online culture. He previously served as the Daily Dot’s news editor, was a staff writer at Gawker, and edited the classic websites Urlesque and Download Squad. His work has also appeared on nymag.com, suicidegirls.com, and the Morning News.