- Chelsea Handler tackles system racism in ‘Hello Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea’ 5 Years Ago
- Gun control proposal: Trump, lawmakers considering background check-conducting app 5 Years Ago
- How to stream Browns vs. Jets on Monday Night Football Today 7:00 AM
- What are anons? Today 6:30 AM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Falcons on Sunday Night Football Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 4 Today 5:00 AM
- How to stream WWE’s Clash of Champions 2019 Saturday 8:00 PM
- How ‘F*ck off Scotland’ became a Scottish rallying cry amid Brexit madness Saturday 6:28 PM
- A Missouri officer resigned after his Islamophobic Facebook posts surfaced Saturday 5:08 PM
- Adding ‘Triggered’ to stock photos of white men creates Netflix comedy special thumbnails Saturday 3:10 PM
- New restaurant in New York has a seriously unfortunate name: ‘Qanoon’ Saturday 1:38 PM
- These are the 10 best ‘Star Wars’ ships Saturday 12:41 PM
- Google Maps helped solve a decades-old missing persons case Saturday 12:27 PM
- Teen who plotted deadly swatting prank over Call of Duty argument gets prison time Saturday 11:58 AM
- RIP to the real star of ‘Stranger Things’: Steve Harrington’s mullet Saturday 11:04 AM
Amid rising concerns over personal data collection, the government wants to ensure companies are protecting our privacy and data online, and on Friday afternoon, President Obama released a draft proposal of a consumer data privacy bill that would do just that.
The proposed bill is meant to give consumers more power over how their data is collected and used, and puts data collection restrictions on technology companies. However, critics say that the proposal doesn’t go far enough to protect consumers.
Companies would be required to create their own codes of conduct and policies regarding how they collect and use data. And startups wouldn’t be subject to the same privacy requirements as larger companies for the first 18 months of their existence.
Loopholes in the proposal, critics say, would actually give the benefit to corporations, not consumers. Justin Brookman, director of consumer privacy at the Center for Democracy & Technology, released a statement describing why the protections in the draft bill don’t go far enough.
Americans have long deserved comprehensive national consumer privacy legislation to protect their personal information. Unfortunately, the President’s bill falls short on the privacy protections needed in today’s digital world: it just has too many loopholes and doesn’t provide for meaningful enforcement. However, it’s encouraging that the President is working to advance privacy legislation and we remain committed to working with the Administration and Congress to improve this initial draft.
The Federal Trade Commission, the protection agency that works to ensure consumer privacy, criticized the bill, and said it did not have “strong and enforceable protections” for consumers.
While apparently benefiting tech companies over consumers thanks to loopholes in the proposal, other requirements will benefit consumers, and make it easier to understand the legalese before turning over your data. Consumers would have the right to ask companies for data, and companies would be required to make the fine print on privacy policies easy to understand. Additionally, corporations would have to be more transparent about how they use data collected.
Microsoft said on Friday that requirements like the one proposed in the draft bill are necessary.
The White House framework tackles issues that are crucial to build trust and foster innovation. Not all will agree with every aspect of the proposal – some will say it goes too far, while others will say it doesn’t go far enough – but it’s a good place to start the conversation.
The president’s draft will act as a framework for future legislation, and modifications will likely be made with additional input from privacy groups and the FTC.
Photo via HarshLight/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Selena Larson is a technology reporter based in San Francisco who writes about the intersection of technology and culture. Her work explores new technologies and the way they impact industries, human behavior, and security and privacy. Since leaving the Daily Dot, she's reported for CNN Money and done technical writing for cybersecurity firm Dragos.