snitchtagging

Flickr/@meddygarnet/Twitter/@itsa_talia

What is ‘snitchtagging’—and why is it a major Twitter ‘no-no’?

Snitchtaggers get stitchtaggers.

Sep 23, 2019, 1:09 pm*

Internet Culture

Stacey Ritzen 

Stacey Ritzen

It’s more or less a universally accepted fact that nobody likes a tattletale or a snitch. Obviously that doesn’t include law enforcement, teachers, or others in positions of authority who benefit from said snitching. But even then, does anyone actually respect a snitcher? Exactly. Allow the prosecution to rest the case. And apparently, the same goes for those who engage in snitchtagging.

Snitchtagging, for the uninitiated, is essentially the practice of strong-arming your way into either a subtle or not-so-subtle Twitter conversation about a third-party who has not been tagged, and making them aware of the conversation by tagging them. At best, it’s an obliviously ignorant online faux pas, and at worst, it’s deviously intentional.

In either case, it’s a total lack of Twitter etiquette, as you can see in the following exchange below:

The practice has become so widely practiced at this point that Dictionary.com defines it as: “the act of tagging the subject of a negative post about them, especially on Twitter, that they weren’t already tagged in (e.g., a subtweet).”

“It ensures the subject is aware of the criticism,” the definition adds. Meanwhile, Urban Dictionary lists the following example:

“Jeff posted about Kate that she was a hoe without tagging her and Sam commented Kate’s username so she would see the post. Jeff: ‘I blocked Sam because he was snitch tagging.'”

Now, research has confirmed that subtweeting does indeed present a serious lack of chill—however, snitchtagging may actually be worse. In other words, while Jeff may have been in the wrong to call Kate “a hoe” on Twitter in the first place (like, grow up Jeff), Sam is unequivocally a little bitch for making her aware of it in such a passive-aggressive way.

Mark Marino, an associate professor of writing and the director of the Humanities and Critical Code Studies Lab at USC, told the Los Angeles Times earlier this year that snitchtagging by tweeting directly at a person is like, “ringing that person’s doorbell and saying what you think of them.”

“It’s hard not to think of the middle-school version where you’re waiting for the sparks to fly,” he added, likening the act to kids egging on a schoolyard fight.

In any case, it’s not hard to see why those who practice snitchtagging are often called out on Twitter, with many users adopting a zero-tolerance policy on snitchtaggers.

And then there is this unconventional example, in which Aaron Carter engages in some perplexingly savage snitchtagging on … himself?

https://twitter.com/itsa_talia/status/1174199897354100738

I mean, if you’ve gotta snitchtag, it might as well be on yourself? Everything is going great!

READ MORE:

Share this article
*First Published: Sep 24, 2019, 7:00 am