- Netflix will remove controversial disaster footage from ‘Bird Box’ Sunday 4:04 PM
- J.K. Rowling’s latest ‘Fantastic Beasts’ reveal is bringing the memes Sunday 3:01 PM
- President Trump calls for government agencies to ‘look into’ ‘Saturday Night Live’ Sunday 12:18 PM
- How to stream Michael Conlan vs. Ruben Garcia Hernandez for free Sunday 11:00 AM
- ‘Pet Sematary’ is a bloodless remake of a Stephen King classic Sunday 10:50 AM
- Here’s the Marvel movie order list you didn’t know you needed Sunday 9:59 AM
- Where do 2020 Democratic candidates stand on weed? Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Billions’ season 4 for free Sunday 6:30 AM
- If you’re not using Vudu, you’re missing out Sunday 6:00 AM
- Everything you need to know about WhatsApp Sunday 5:30 AM
- ‘The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley’ tries to get a read on Elizabeth Holmes Saturday 1:57 PM
- ‘Band Together with Logic’ shows us the best of the Internet Saturday 1:32 PM
- How to watch Spence vs. Garcia online Saturday 12:00 PM
- Far-right Australian politician gets egged by teen on video Saturday 11:28 AM
- Inside the solar-powered van that’s recording your favorite bands Saturday 10:48 AM
Think before you tweet.
The next time you think about throwing shade with a subtweet, know that people might look upon you a little less favorably. Researchers Autumn Edwards and Christina Harris investigated how people interpret subtweeting, and found that readers find subtweets, and their tweeters, unlikable. Their research will be published in Computers in Human Behavior.
Subtweeting may have begun on Twitter—so-called “subliminal tweeting,” or tweeting about people without actually mentioning a name or Twitter handle. But the subtweet also lives on Facebook, Snapchat, Tumblr, Instagram, and every other social site. Your readers, and the person you’re talking about, know who you mean, even if you’re not calling them out directly.
This act of tweeting about someone without name-dropping is common on Twitter, but your followers, and anyone else who sees your tweets, will probably judge you.
Edwards and Harris conducted a study with 349 undergraduate college students; each viewed four tweets. One was nice and mentioned someone, one was mean and mentioned someone, one was a rude subtweet, and the other was a kind subtweet. Students were then asked a series of questions regarding their perception of the tweet and who sent it.
Researchers said students rated subtweets less socially competent as a whole, causing a less favorable impressions of the tweeter. Further, students had better impressions of positive tweet writers, especially those who named a subject instead of subtweeting about them.
Negative tweets were interpreted a bit differently—people look less favorably on someone when they mention a subject in a negative tweet, directly calling them out, versus passive-aggressively tweeting by not using a name.
Although negative subtweets may be viewed as passive aggressive or bullying communication, participants preferred them to direct negative posts. Therefore, there was an impression-related benefit to obscuring the identity of the target when the post was negative. The benefit is likely magnified on SNSs because the audience of hearers is public and includes both onlookers and the subject of anti-locution.
It appears people generally prefer to see positive content, whether people are named directly or not. But if you do want to throw a little negativity into your timeline, mentioning someone outright might make people look even more unfavorably upon it.
Unless, of course, you don’t care what people think about you. You know who you are.
Selena Larson is a technology reporter based in San Francisco who writes about the intersection of technology and culture. Her work explores new technologies and the way they impact industries, human behavior, and security and privacy. Since leaving the Daily Dot, she's reported for CNN Money and done technical writing for cybersecurity firm Dragos.