- Khloé Kardashian angers followers with a calorie-counting joke about True 12 Months Ago
- Spider-Man may no longer be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe 12 Months Ago
- Robert De Niro’s company is suing ex-employee for binge-watching Netflix at work Today 4:41 PM
- Intentionally misgendering a character could get you banned from Borderlands 3 Today 4:06 PM
- Facebook pulls Trump re-election ad for targeting ‘strong women’ Today 4:03 PM
- Kamala Harris says she will restore net neutrality if elected Today 3:16 PM
- All 8 of the ‘Rocky’ movies, ranked Today 2:50 PM
- Everything you need to know about the Facebook conservative bias report Today 2:35 PM
- Study links emoji use to more sex Today 2:10 PM
- The chicken sandwich war is in full throttle on Twitter Today 1:47 PM
- Netflix’s ‘Sextuplets’ proves Marlon Wayans is no Eddie Murphy—or even Mike Myers Today 1:31 PM
- Facebook is finally rolling out its clear history tool Today 1:13 PM
- ‘Theater etiquette’ tweets surge after YouTuber cast in ‘Waitress’ Today 12:55 PM
- A GoFundMe for Eric Garner’s killer has raised more than $70,000 Today 12:49 PM
- YouTuber finds GoPro footage of man who drowned in 2017 Today 12:20 PM
On Monday night, a group of 22 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia urged a U.S. Court of Appeals to reinstate the net neutrality rules that were taken away after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rescinded them last year, Reuters reports.
New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, who is leading the charge among the attorneys general, said the brief filed urges the court to reverse the FCC’s order because it “puts consumers at risk of abusive practices by broadband providers, it jeopardizes public safety, and more.”
“Let’s not forget, the fight for #NetNeutrality is essentially a fight to protect the modern public square,” Underwood wrote on Twitter. “Corporations should not be able to decide who gets to speak, what they can talk about, and how loudly they can say it. But that could be the future of the internet.”
The brief essentially argues that the FCC did not take into account how internet service providers (ISPs) would “engage in abusive practices that undermine the open internet,” such as blocking or arbitrarily speeding up or slowing down content.
The states participating in the fight are: New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
The group filed its own brief on Monday which argues that the FCC ignored the public record ahead of its vote to rescind net neutrality rules.
“It is imperative that all internet traffic be treated equally, without discrimination against content or type of traffic—that’s how the internet was built and what has made it one of the greatest inventions of all time,” the company wrote in a statement.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).