- Netflix’s ‘Ozark’ beat ‘Game of Thrones’ in 2 major Emmy categories 3 Months Ago
- Animator for Netflix’s ‘Carmen Sandiego’ says he was fired after asking for fair pay Sunday 3:17 PM
- YouTube reverses decision to remove creators’ badges Sunday 1:47 PM
- How video game developer Valve got served secret subpoena as part of FBI’s counterterrorism fight Sunday 12:31 PM
- Aron Eisenberg, ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’ actor, dead at 50 Sunday 11:35 AM
- Who needs glass slippers? This Cinderella cosplayer upgraded with a stunning glass arm Sunday 10:19 AM
- How to check if Yahoo owes you $358 Sunday 9:25 AM
- How to stream Bears vs. Redskins on Monday Night Football Sunday 7:00 AM
- What are the best alternatives to the electoral college? Sunday 6:30 AM
- The best PS4 games you can’t play anywhere else Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 Emmy Awards Sunday 5:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 5 Sunday 4:00 AM
- Former developer at software company deletes his code to protest its ties to ICE Saturday 4:21 PM
- A mysterious website is doxing Hong Kong protesters and journalists Saturday 1:44 PM
- The best ‘Skyrim’ followers and how to get them Saturday 1:26 PM
Charged with providing food and water to migrants in an area of the desert that has claimed the lives of at least 32 so far, Arizona teacher and humanitarian Scott Warren will not be going to prison—at least not yet. Now, people familiar with the Bible are finding particular irony in a prosecutor’s statement during the trial.
Warren was charged with three felonies last year after helping two migrants who had crossed into Arizona from Central America. He faced 20 years in prison, and his case drew international interest as a landmark decision regarding volunteer aid on the U.S. border.
After 15 hours of deliberation, the jury failed to reach a verdict on June 11.
BREAKING: HUNG JURY in the #ScottWarren case. After 15+ hours of deliberation, a hung jury was officially declared, demonstrating that there are Arizonans standing their ground for justice and kindness in a historic moment.— No More Deaths (@NoMoreDeaths) June 11, 2019
Among the celebratory responses, Twitter user Ken Klipperstein pointed out that the accusations levied by the prosecution are almost word-for-word the instructions that were given to Christians in Matthew 25:35.
“He gave them food, he gave them water, he gave them a place to stay… He did a bad thing,” prosecutor Anna Wright said in her closing argument, according to advocacy group No More Deaths, which posted live updates from the trial.
The Bible verse reads as follows: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in.”
During the trial of a man charged with aiding undocumented migrants, the prosecutor accused him of doing almost verbatim what the Bible calls on Christians to do pic.twitter.com/73xSMh1Y6u— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) June 14, 2019
The only real difference is that Wright tacked the rather weak judgment of “he did a bad thing” onto the list of Christian virtues.
THE WORDS ARE EVEN IN THE SAME ORDER, COME ON! https://t.co/5bvFGWilbo— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) June 14, 2019
She must have thought "This phrasing seems familiar for some reason... Welp, who knows. Let's go kick over some water jugs."— Daniel (@MaximumTaco) June 14, 2019
Some wondered if it was a deliberate attempt to sabotage the case given that prosecutors generally have to work the cases they’re given, whether or not they agree with them.
Could it be intentional? Obliquely sabotaging the case?— Friendly Neighborhood Nerd (@engineerchick_) June 15, 2019
I have a feeling this was intentional— anthony gonzales (@animalgonzales) June 15, 2019
Perhaps she was actually trying to quietly help him without anyone being able to accuse her of not doing her job.— TheDCMan1968 (@DCMan1968) June 14, 2019
But a woman who says she was a witness to the trail thinks otherwise.
“The prosecutor read her script fairly well, but stumbled over her words during questioning,” the witness, Jennifer Bennett Powers, tweeted. “She definitely wanted to win the case.”
I sat in the courtroom during this trial. The prosecutor read her script fairly well, but stumbled over her words during questioning. She most definitely wanted to win the case.— Jennifer Bennett Powers (@JenBenPowers) June 15, 2019
People were pointing out that Jesus himself was born to desperate migrants.
'Literally' the night Jesus was born his folks were stumbling about Bethlehem on a donkey looking for a bed for the night, apparently tired, hungrey and needing a place to have a baby. I know irony is hard for some, but this example is spot on.— 💧Alison (@plainnotjayne) June 14, 2019
But what did Jesus' family know about fleeing to a foreign country for safety, anyway? pic.twitter.com/AFp1GWX4co— Grover's Bathtub (@GroversBathtub) June 14, 2019
Commenters also noted the irony of the court requiring Warren to swear on the Bible before attempting to prosecute him for obeying it.
Did they make him put his hand on the bible, before condemning him with the bible's own words, for doing the bible's own deeds? I am endlessly fascinated with all this bible-stuff, it's impossible to guess what might occur next!— Auja-winduR Mārs (@Zegh8578) June 14, 2019
The best part is that the defendant had to put his hand on those words and swear by them before giving testimony 🤪— Behold! The Mongoose (@ketchupagogo) June 15, 2019
Klippenstein’s tweet has now jumped to Facebook as a shareable post, so there’s likely more commentary to come.
- Man sues brewery after identifying as female to get beer discount
- Teen confesses to killing her best friend on video to get $9 million from a stranger online
- Instagram artist accused of faking her paintings says they’re ‘100%’ real
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Siobhan Ball is a historian, archivist, and journalist. She also writes for Autostraddle and bi.org