- Is that Rosa Parks in random Twitter user’s baby photo? Tuesday 8:24 PM
- Syracuse students say white supremacist manifesto was AirDropped to them Tuesday 7:44 PM
- Florida woman gets prison time for throwing slushie at Matt Gaetz Tuesday 6:28 PM
- Marie Kondo’s online store slammed for selling clutter-worthy products Tuesday 5:34 PM
- People are rallying against toxic masculinity on International Men’s Day Tuesday 4:42 PM
- Reddit wants to stop its pro-Trump forum from outing the alleged whistleblower Tuesday 3:38 PM
- White woman calls cops on man who said he was visiting aunt with his kids Tuesday 3:12 PM
- ‘The Stranded’ is a flawed yet addictive blend of ‘Degrassi’ and ‘Lost’ Tuesday 2:45 PM
- The ‘gonna tell my kids’ meme is revisionist history at its most absurd Tuesday 2:24 PM
- Redditor asks former burglars to give home security tips Tuesday 2:18 PM
- Facebook-Breitbart partnership under fire in wake of new Stephen Miller emails Tuesday 2:00 PM
- John Krasinski under fire after praising the CIA Tuesday 1:46 PM
- Conservatives melt down after Chick-fil-A says it will stop donating to anti-LGBTQ orgs Tuesday 1:33 PM
- ‘Honey Boy’ is an experimental look at channeling trauma Tuesday 1:28 PM
- Disney+ now allows users to resume and restart content Tuesday 11:42 AM
An Illinois court approved a lawsuit on Thursday from consumers who claim that Facebook used facial recognition technology on their photos without consent.
Facebook attempted to have the class-action lawsuit dismissed but was shot down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The Illinois users filed suit back in 2015 after they say Facebook violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, which requires that consent be obtained before gathering anyone’s biometric data. Those found to have intentionally violated the law can be forced to pay up to $5,000 per person. Given the massive number of Facebook users across the state, a successful lawsuit against the tech giant could result in billions in fines.
The social media company first began using facial recognition technology back in 2010 for its photo-tagging feature, scanning countless pictures without user permission.
Facebook argued that its actions resulted in no “concrete injury,” but Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta thinks the company overstepped.
“We conclude that the development of a face template using facial-recognition technology without consent (as alleged here) invades an individual’s private affairs and concrete interests,” Judge Ikuta wrote.
But the social network isn’t going down without a fight. In a statement to Reuters, a company spokesperson said Facebook would be appealing Thursday’s ruling.
“We have always disclosed our use of face recognition technology and that people can turn it on or off at any time,” the spokesperson said.
A consumer advocacy group reported in May, however, that not all Facebook users had been given the ability to opt-out.
The court’s decision comes amid a growing backlash to facial recognition technology by the public and even some sectors of the government.
A bipartisan group of DC lawmakers also raised concerns over the technology’s danger during a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing earlier this year.
- Democrats want to ban use of facial recognition in public housing
- Internet rights group calls on government to stop using facial recognition
- College students unknowingly photographed as part of secret face recognition project
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.