Chris Evans launches political site


Chris Evans’ new politics website leaves Marvel fans scratching their heads

Do politicians really need another platform?


Nahila Bonfiglio

Internet Culture

Posted on Apr 9, 2019   Updated on May 20, 2021, 3:18 pm CDT

Chris Evans is no stranger to politics.

The 37-year-old actor, best known for his portrayal of Steve Rogers in Marvel’s Captain America franchise, has been vocal about his political views for years. His Twitter page tends to be a melting pot of snarky political posts, in addition to dog posts. But Evans recently took a much bigger step into politics with the development of his new “secret, non-partisan civic engagement” project, reportedly dubbed “A Starting Point.” As more details come to light, many fans are scratching their heads.

Evans’ newest venture was announced following the discovery of a leaked video. “I just thought ‘why isn’t there a place I can go to hear both sides of an issue in a succinct way that I can trust,” Evans said in the clip, per CNN.

He explained that politicians being interviewed can skip questions that they don’t like, and re-do any answers that don’t come out just right.

“I want to make it clear that this website has nothing to do with my political opinion,” Evans said in the video. “It’s not about my political opinion. This is about yours. This is a chance for you to talk about issues that matter to you.”

You know, because politicians never get a platform to talk about their political opinions. Evans called the site a “one-stop-shop for simple, digestible information from the people that know best.”

Do politicians know best though? Just because a politician yells the loudest does not make them more of an expert than researchers or scientists.

Links to further information will reportedly be accessible with each video, where viewers can find out more if they so choose. The goal of the site, according to the video, is “to provide succinct answers to common questions by presenting both the Democratic and Republican point of view on dozens of issues across the political landscape.”

That sounds innocent enough, but people couldn’t help but point out the many flaws in its conception. Not only is it giving voice to people who already have a massive platform, but it lends credence to the balance fallacy. This idea, which used to be very common in journalism, hinges on the idea that both sides of an argument should always be heard. This seems like a great idea until you consider ideas like white supremacy and climate change. On one side of these arguments, people commonly have extensive expertise and research to back them up. On the other, there are opinions. These two sides do not deserve to be treated with equal weight.

There is also a definite flaw in interviewing inherently political people for a venture purportedly aiming to lessen polarization.

People were quick to point out some issues they had with Evans’ project online.

“Can’t wait to have my existence and basic humanity framed as a ‘debate’ in yet another online venue,” one commenter said. “Hard pass,” another commenter added. “We have way too much ‘both sides’ as it is. It turns out, sometimes one side is right and one side is wrong. Checks notes…kids in cages is wrong, ripping healthcare from millions is wrong, stoking racism is wrong. Skip the both sides crap.”

Other commenters felt that the idea had potential, as long as it was approached correctly.

Everyone else pretty much stuck to jokes about very unbalanced viewpoints. “9/11 was both good and bad,” one commenter joked.

There were also those who supported Evan’s venture. They took to Twitter to compliment the effort, lauding it as the perfect first step.

The project has yet to be officially launched, so it may end up looking a bit different by the time we see the completed effort. Here’s hoping Evans switches his focus to hinge more upon objectivity than neutrality.


H/T Daily Beast

Share this article
*First Published: Apr 9, 2019, 10:30 am CDT