- Miss USA thought everyone spoke English—and the internet is not amused Thursday 8:02 PM
- Kanye’s Twitter tirade prompts apology from Drake Thursday 6:00 PM
- Listen to Pitbull cover Toto’s ‘Africa’ for the ‘Aquaman’ soundtrack—or don’t Thursday 4:55 PM
- Nancy Pelosi’s coat is the meme the resistance needed Thursday 4:39 PM
- Oprah says what was really on her mind while she ate bland chicken Thursday 4:00 PM
- Democrats predicted to go in on net neutrality when they take House Thursday 3:33 PM
- Holland Tunnel decorations are a real nightmare before Christmas Thursday 2:12 PM
- Amazon still won’t say whether ICE uses its facial recognition tech Thursday 1:13 PM
- Ninja to host Thursday Night Football Thursday 12:00 PM
- How to stream the NFL’s Week 15 for free Thursday 12:00 PM
- An undecorated room sets off a debate on Twitter Thursday 11:42 AM
- Netflix announces Taylor Swift ‘Reputation’ concert film Thursday 11:29 AM
- People are making memes out of these ‘leaked’ ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ posters Thursday 11:12 AM
- How to watch the Liga MX final between Club América and Cruz Azul online for free Thursday 10:38 AM
- Parents shocked by KKK costumes in school play Thursday 10:11 AM
Majority of Americans dislike both Trump and Clinton as interest in third-party spikes online
Vote for…umm…I guess…somebody else…maybe?
So much about the 2016 presidential election is unprecedented. But perhaps nothing is more unusual than the electorate’s level of dissatisfaction with both major parties’ likely nominees.
An NBC News-SurveyMonkey poll released earlier this week found that, while Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton maintains her lead in a head-to-head match-up with presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, neither candidate is popular with the public at large.
Approximately 60 percent of respondents told pollsters that they either “disliked” or “hated” Clinton, while 63 percent felt the same way about Trump.
Pollster Laura Wronski noted that 23 percent of respondents said they disliked or hated both Trump and Clinton.
“Traditionally a fair number of partisans on either side of the aisle express negative opinions about the other party’s candidate,” NBC News said in its story about the results, “but the latest poll found that a majority of voters express negative feelings about both leading candidates.”
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is still mounting an aggressive campaign for the Democratic nomination, but Clinton’s significant lead in pledged delegates has considerably narrowed Sanders’s window.
On the political betting market PredictIt, electoral futures traders have collectively given Clinton an 89 percent chance of beating Sanders, whose likelihood of becoming the party’s nominee is only three percentage points higher than that of Vice President Joe Biden, who never even entered the race.
According to research compiled by the digital marketing firm iQuanti, deep dissatisfaction with the two parties’ leading candidates is likely producing higher interest in third-party candidates than in previous election cycles. Google search data reflects this trend.
By iQuanti’s own analysis, searches for third-party candidates peaked in March at nearly 16 million and have since dipped to just above 8 million in April.
But that interest in McAfee was likely driven by his very public offer to break the security features on an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. McAfee eventually admitted in an interview with the Daily Dot that his claims about being able to break into the device were lies intended to draw public attention to the larger threat posed by the FBI‘s demand that Apple help it access the phone.
The second most-searched-for independent candidate was the former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party’s candidate. Trailing Johnson were Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein and Transhumanist Zoltan Istvan.
It’s unlikely that curiosity about McAfee will translate into actual electoral support. That may not be true for Johnson, though, and if he wins even a marginal share of the vote in November, it could tip the outcome.
While a third-party run could still technically happen, the U.S. presidential election’s winner-take-all system makes it incredibly difficult for a third-party candidate to win.
When those candidates have mounted serious efforts—like Ralph Nader in 2000 or Ross Perot in 1992 and 1996—they’ve traditionally played the role of a spoiler, pushing that election toward the major-party candidate on the opposite side of the ideological spectrum by siphoning off votes from that person’s opponent.
H/T NBC News
Aaron Sankin is a former Senior Staff Writer at the Daily Dot who covered the intersection of politics, technology, online privacy, Twitter bots, and the role of dank memes in popular culture. He lives in Seattle, Washington. He joined the Center for Investigative Reporting in 2016.