- Apple warns coronavirus expected to cause iPhone ‘supply shortages’ Monday 7:59 PM
- Will ‘The Bachelor’ end without an engagement? Monday 7:44 PM
- This ‘Little Women’ scene just became a meme Monday 7:03 PM
- Playable version of Blizzard’s ‘StarCraft: Ghost’ leaks online nearly 15 years after cancelation Monday 6:31 PM
- This Twitter extension can block unsolicited nudes from your inbox Monday 6:01 PM
- Jeffree Star wears cornrows after being accused of cultural appropriation Monday 4:49 PM
- Jeff Bezos says he’ll commit $10 billion to combat climate change Monday 4:18 PM
- A TikTok user went on a mission to turn his urine blue by chugging food coloring Monday 3:55 PM
- YouTuber’s vacation in ‘Bali’ was actually staged at Ikea Monday 3:14 PM
- Video shows liquor store manager calling employee ‘f*cking worthless’ Monday 1:16 PM
- Instagram influencer scams followers out of $1.5 million Monday 12:22 PM
- Why did the Israeli military tweet this thirst trap? Monday 10:43 AM
- Jake Paul wants you to have financial freedom… by paying him a monthly fee Monday 10:40 AM
- Tweets from Sanders supporters are terrifying the establishment Monday 10:15 AM
- Zuckerberg says he supports 1 bill in Congress that would regulate Facebook Monday 10:11 AM
Twitter reportedly close to announcing ‘edit’ feature, with a few catches
Nobody’s perfect—especially not online.
Forget about the photo-messaging wars for a moment. Over on The Desk, blogger Matthew Keys confirmed with three Twitter sources that the company is close to cracking a more significant problem for the platform: namely, the inability to modify a tweet after it’s been posted—whether that means fixing a harmless typo or retroactively inserting a word like “Unconfirmed” into a breaking news headline.
A tool for tweaking existing tweets has been in the works for months, Keys reported, and may still be months away, as it will rely on a sophisticated algorithm designed to place strict controls over how, when, and why a post is edited. The feature would have a time limit, the length of which has yet to be determined, and only allow you rewrite once (so on the second try, actually proofread what you’ve written, or you’ll have to delete and start fresh).
In case my server goes down: Here’s how Twitter’s “edit” feature is designed to work – pic.twitter.com/NIkZs1h7Pm
— Matthew Keys (@MatthewKeysLive) December 16, 2013
Twitter representatives are declining to officially comment on the news, as it’s far from certain the feature will see the light of day. Were it added, a few journalistic partners and verified accounts will be invited to try it first. The rationale here is in the interest of staunching the flow of misinformation—an unfounded rumor of a celebrity death, for example—with a sort of trickle-down editorial effect: when the original tweet is modified, the change is also reflected in the feeds of everyone who retweeted it. Manual retweets, meanwhile, would not be affected.
Because an edit could be forced upon other accounts, Twitter is put in the tricky position of having to police any shift in semantics. It’s one thing to simply retract a misleading or offensive article that’s been widely echoed, another to replace it with sponsored content and thereby hijack feeds for advertising purposes. In theory, Twitter’s algorithm would judge whether a user was trying to revise the intention of a tweet or its framing, and prohibit the former.
Even with that complex detection system, plus word and character limits built into the feature, we don’t expect social media’s top mischief makers to be long in finding loopholes to exploit. After all, “public” is just one letter away from “pubic.”
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'