- Skillshare is offering new users one month of premium for free 2 Years Ago
- Report: Facebook is punishing Black people for talking about racism Today 10:15 AM
- Biden brings tepid language to the healthcare debate Today 9:52 AM
- TikTok’s ‘chin on palm’ challenge has people scratching their heads Today 9:01 AM
- How to stream the 2019 NFL Draft for free Today 9:00 AM
- How to watch every movie in the MCU before ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Today 8:00 AM
- Review: The apocalypse has never been more aimless than in Days Gone Today 7:00 AM
- ‘Boston bomber voting’ discourse is America at its dumbest Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Top Gear’ for free Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch Real Madrid vs. Getafe online for free Today 6:00 AM
- How safe is the ‘safest’ place in Winterfell? Today 5:00 AM
- Gynecologist explains why garlic shouldn’t go in vaginas Wednesday 7:08 PM
- People on Twitter are posting the 5 weirdest jobs they’ve had for this meme Wednesday 6:48 PM
- Mortal Kombat 11’s Jax ends slavery—and gamers are pissed Wednesday 5:46 PM
- GPS app gave hacker ability to remotely shut off car engines Wednesday 3:58 PM
Why ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ looks different from old ‘Star Trek’
There’s no in-universe explanation for why ‘Discovery’ looks so different from the 1960s series. And you know what? It doesn’t matter.
If you don’t spend much time in Trek fandom, this will sound ridiculous. The Original Series (TOS) began in 1966, filmed on a modest budget. Of course a modern, multi-million dollar show is going to look different. But Discovery takes place a decade before TOS in the Star Trek timeline, and fans want to know why Starfleet’s ships and uniforms changed so much in those 10 years.
Unfortunately for those fans, we may never get an in-universe explanation. And really, we don’t need one. You might as well ask why Skyfall had more complicated fight scenes than Goldfinger, or why Yoda was CGI in The Clone Wars and a puppet in the original Star Wars trilogy. Technology evolves, and so do the tastes of the audience.
The original series did the best it could with wobbly sets and cheap costumes, inspired by a 1960s vision of the future. The interiors of the U.S.S. Enterprise look like grey boxes with multicolored disco lighting. Even if you gently upgraded this aesthetic with more expensive materials, Discovery would still look like a retro pastiche.
This isn’t the first time Star Trek experienced a drastic makeover. In 1979, the first Star Trek movie used its Hollywood budget to redesign the Enterprise and radically overhaul the uniforms. The sets and special effects looked more realistic, and the costumes… well. We may never know why Starfleet opted for pastel pantsuits with built-in shoes. And that was when creator Gene Roddenberry was still in charge!
In 1960s Star Trek, “futuristic” meant beehive wigs, hand-painted alien landscapes, and the revolutionary idea that Russians and Americans could cooperate in space. By the ’90s, we had convincing special effects and captains who weren’t white men. Discovery‘s future is governed by our own present, which is very different from the world that inspired the Original Series. In 2017, Star Trek has an unprecedentedly diverse cast, and looks like a glossy sci-fi drama to rival shows like The Expanse and Westworld.
There’s a running joke in Star Trek fandom that Trekkies hate every new show, regardless of quality. Then they fall in love after a season or so, with a tenacity that inspires decade-long renewal campaigns when those shows get canceled. In other words, Trek fans have a weird habit of hating anything new, despite being obsessed with a story about exploration, discovery, and looking to the future.
So if you’re annoyed by Discovery‘s lack of 1960s minidresses and clunky production design, please remember that some people hated The Next Generation for similar reasons. Also, Voyager once aired an episode where two main characters turn into newts, have newt babies together, and then abandon those babies on a swamp planet. It’s hard to imagine Discovery being worse than that.
Gavia Baker-Whitelaw is a staff writer at the Daily Dot, covering geek culture and fandom. Specializing in sci-fi movies and superheroes, she also appears as a film and TV critic on BBC radio. Elsewhere, she co-hosts the pop culture podcast Overinvested.