- Multimillion-dollar ‘Farming Simulator’ franchise enters world of esports Wednesday 7:38 PM
- Sandra Bullock, Chris McKay are making Netflix comic film ‘Reborn’ Wednesday 7:22 PM
- Instagram revokes Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s verified status Wednesday 5:23 PM
- Transgender people suffer when debates over their rights are framed as ‘distractions’ Wednesday 4:57 PM
- Hulu with Live TV just hiked its prices Wednesday 4:05 PM
- Hacker infiltrates Nest cameras to gain PewDiePie subscribers Wednesday 2:37 PM
- YouTube time traveler claims MLK’s granddaughter will be the last U.S. president Wednesday 2:30 PM
- Media coverage of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Twitch cameo erases Chelsea Manning Wednesday 1:39 PM
- New Alexa skill lets you sing with Queen’s Freddie Mercury Wednesday 1:13 PM
- Netflix is the first streaming platform to join MPAA Wednesday 12:59 PM
- Can you spot an email from a hacker? Wednesday 12:46 PM
- Gina Rodriguez cries over being called anti-Black, gets dragged for ‘fake tears’ Wednesday 12:21 PM
- Boots Riley explains why he got snubbed by the Oscars Wednesday 12:20 PM
- Review: ‘Buffy’ returns with a modern comic book reboot Wednesday 11:47 AM
- You’re about to see a lot more Netflix on your Instagram Wednesday 11:32 AM
This is what we knew about wiretaps and Internet surveillance before Edward Snowden.
Certainly, the revelations about the National Security Agency’s Internet surveillance program are alarming. But they’re hardly surprising. Considering the executive branch’s recent history of domestic monitoring, PRISM was all but inevitable.
Recall when, in late 2005, the New York Times reported that then-president George W. Bush had authorized the NSA to monitor, without warrants, the international emails and phone calls of “hundreds, perhaps thousands” of American citizens. According to the Times, the program began in 2002, in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. “This is really a sea change,” a former senior official who specializes in national security law told the paper. “It’s almost a mainstay of this country that the NSA only does foreign searches.”
A sea change it was: Only three months later, in March of 2006, it was leaked that the NSA was also building a database of American phone calls. “The National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth,” USA Today reported. This program, too, dated back to September 11, 2001. “It’s the largest database ever assembled in the world,” a source told the paper.
Now public, Bush’s wiretap program, which was already on tenuous footing under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), was shut down in January 2007. According to the Washington Post, the NSA began its PRISM program the same year. Soon after, FISA was amended to give immunity to corporations that participate in government intelligence collection.
Certainly, PRISM is a much more invasive program than either the telephone call metadata surveillance or the Bush wiretaps that began after September 11, 2001. But that may be more of a consequence of technology than NSA policy. In 2001, Facebook didn’t exist. Nor did Skype or YouTube. Meanwhile, Google was a private company, only three years old.
Since at least the World Trade Center attacks in 2001, the NSA has simply taken whatever it can get.
And by 2007, that was a lot.
Photo by Mark Turnauckas/Flickr
Joe Kloc is a former Daily Dot contributor who covered technology and policy. He's contributed to Newsweek and Mother Jones, discussed his reporting on air with WNYC, and written Weekly Reviews for Harper's Magazine.