- ‘Star Trek: Picard’ recap, episode 5: ‘Stardust City Rag’ 3 Years Ago
- Roger Stone sentenced to 40 months in prison 3 Years Ago
- New The 1975 music video is full of memes you’ll love 3 Years Ago
- Black model speaks out after fashion show featured racist accessories 3 Years Ago
- CBS to launch ‘House of Brands’ to bulk up streaming Today 11:57 AM
- Steven Spielberg’s daughter is launching a career in adult entertainment Today 11:24 AM
- Congress asks Ring for more information about police partnerships Today 10:38 AM
- Vlogger who posts behind-the-scenes footage at Disney is in trouble with YouTube Today 10:16 AM
- Was Bloomberg owned harder on the debate stage or by Twitter? Today 8:54 AM
- Make ‘Animal Crossing: New Horizons’ your desert island game Today 8:51 AM
- Everyone’s trying to dance like Jennifer Lopez on TikTok Today 8:27 AM
- Why the coronavirus bioweapon theory persists Today 7:57 AM
- You won’t see deleted scenes on the ‘Rise of Skywalker’ home release Today 7:47 AM
- The return of ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ throws you right back into the fight Today 7:00 AM
- Am I overreacting to a Facebook message from a dating app match? Today 6:00 AM
Size matters, it turns out. Especially when it comes to something like the budget.
The photo of the crowd at President Donald Trump’s inauguration side-by-side with former President Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration is already haunting the new administration. While the inauguration festivities were ripe with meme-able content, it’s that bird’s eye view of the crowd that just keeps rearing its head in the strangest places. After the photo went viral on Friday, it returned as the primary subject matter of White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s Saturday press conference, and now, again, in a confirmation hearing for budget director pick Mick Mulvaney.
Facing questioning from Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, a Democrat, Mulvaney was presented with a poster-sized blowup of the two shots and asked which crowd was bigger. (He answered 2009, for the record.)
Mulvaney raised some skepticism about what this had to do with the Office of Management and Budget, but Merkley deflected, saying “presenting falsehoods as ‘alternative facts,’” especially where it pertains to the budget, could be disastrous. The line of questioning continued to discuss tax cuts of the 1980s and proposed changes to the tax code that might “decrease services for struggling American families.”
There were no posters for that portion of the discussion.
Monica Riese now serves as the Daily Dot’s director of production, having previously been the publication’s entertainment editor and assistant managing editor. She is based in Austin, Texas, and formerly contributed to the Austin Chronicle, where her breaking news work was recognized by the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies.