- Swipe This! He hasn’t texted me back. Should I text him again? 3 Years Ago
- New Loch Ness monster video may just confirm giant eel theory Wednesday 8:04 PM
- Instagram to restrict posts promoting diet culture and plastic surgery Wednesday 6:58 PM
- Apple wants to trademark ‘Slofie,’ its term for slow-motion selfies Wednesday 5:51 PM
- Fortnite leak reveals a Batman crossover event may be happening Wednesday 5:32 PM
- The explosion at a bull semen factory generated a lot of obvious jokes Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Jessica Jaymes, adult film star, dead at 43 Wednesday 4:18 PM
- How to stream Falcons vs. Colts in Week 3 Wednesday 4:05 PM
- Beto O’Rourke says he opposes police use of facial recognition tech Wednesday 4:01 PM
- Lawsuit alleges woman was kidnapped by Lyft driver and gang-raped Wednesday 3:19 PM
- Facebook and Ray-Ban want to replace smartphones with smart glasses Wednesday 3:13 PM
- Sirfetch’d is the gallant new Pokémon winning everyone’s heart Wednesday 3:09 PM
- Danielle Cohn’s dad says she’s not really 15 years old Wednesday 2:14 PM
- Chilling ad by Sandy Hook Promise features kids using school supplies during a shooting Wednesday 1:50 PM
- Don’t fall victim to this Venmo texting scam Wednesday 1:18 PM
What’s wrong with this picture?
That’s right—Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, does not appear in the dedicated “active campaigns” results box at the top of Google searches for “presidential candidates.” But that’s not the only error here.
Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson is also excluded, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who conceded to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on Tuesday evening, is no longer running an active campaign. Nor does it include any of the other independent candidates running for president this year.
Interestingly, this issue first popped up earlier this month when Stein petitioned Google to include her in the “presidential candidates” results—which, at the time, also included Trump and Johnson.
The exclusion of Trump caught the attention of Reddit‘s highly active and contentious r/The_Donald community early Wednesday morning, where users speculated a Google conspiracy against their candidate of choice.
Claims of censorship are a mainstay on the internet and have percolated to the surface over the past week after WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. Twitter was accused of censoring a trending hashtag related to the leaks. And Facebook faced similar criticism after blocking links to the whistleblower website. In both cases, the issues were attributed to algorithmic functions and not intentional censorship by Silicon Valley firms.
So, the error is likely not an intentional attempt by Google to mislead the American people and is far more likely the result of algorithm insufficiency.
Searches for “presidential candidates” are actually not particularly popular—at least, according to Google Trends—which shows that search term scores far lower than slightly different terms, like “2016 presidential candidates” and “presidential candidates 2016,” which is by far the most-searched term of the trio.
As you can see above, the “presidential candidates” term was last used on a wide scale in 2008, which is likely why the dedicated results box at the top of the Google search page is woefully outdated—Google likely just didn’t prioritize tweaking that feature to be fully accurate.
Google did not immediately respond to our request for further explanation of the search error, and we will update with any response we receive.
In the mean time, you can easily get around this problem by clicking the myriad of links to other sources that appear in the results for “presidential candidates”—resources made easily accessible by Google’s otherwise top-class search—or simply use a different search term. Or, if you prefer to don a tin foil hat, feel free to freak out.
Update 9:12am CT, July 26: Added additional contextual information regarding the “presidential candidates” search results.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.