- How to stream Jaguars vs. Bengals in Week 7 3 Years Ago
- How to stream Texans vs. Colts in Week 7 Today 3:00 AM
- Man dragged for recording, posting video of neighbor being ‘killed’ instead of helping Saturday 4:14 PM
- How to stream Saints vs. Bears in Week 7 Saturday 3:25 PM
- How to stream Seahawks vs. Ravens in Week 7 Saturday 3:25 PM
- Are TikTok teens throwing up gang signs in their videos? Saturday 2:45 PM
- Anti-impeachment protesters believe ‘deep state’ tried to sabotage rally Saturday 12:51 PM
- How to stream 49ers vs. Redskins in Week 7 Saturday 12:00 PM
- How to stream Cardinals vs. Giants in Week 7 Saturday 12:00 PM
- How to stream Packers vs. Raiders in Week 7 Saturday 12:00 PM
- How to stream Vikings vs. Lions in Week 7 Saturday 12:00 PM
- How to stream Rams vs. Falcons in Week 7 Saturday 12:00 PM
- Billie Eilish fans think they figured out who stole her ring Saturday 11:32 AM
- ‘Give me candy’: Hailey Bieber mocked for defense of celebrating Halloween as a Christian Saturday 10:28 AM
- Aaron Paul predicted Jesse Pinkman’s fate on Reddit years ago Saturday 8:53 AM
President Donald Trump has been clear about his intentions to confirm an anti-abortion Supreme Court judge to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, but his own nomination may not necessarily fit the bill.
On Tuesday during his confirmation hearing, Supreme Court Justice nominee Neil Gorsuch told South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham that if Trump asked him to overturn Roe v. Wade, he would have “walked out the door.”
Graham had asked Gorsuch if he had met Trump personally. When Gorsuch replied he had during his interview, Graham asked if Trump asked him to overrule the abortion rights case, which Gorsuch denied.
“I would have walked out the door. It’s not what judges do,” Gorsuch said pointedly. “I don’t do it on that end of Pennsylvania Avenue, and they shouldn’t do it at this end either, respectfully.”
Earlier in the day, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and California Sen. Dianne Feinstein pressed Gorsuch on the precedent of Roe v. Wade, considering the president’s promise for a judge who would overturn the ruling.
“[Roe v. Wade] is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It has been reaffirmed,” Gorsuch said. “A good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court, worthy of treatment as precedent, like any other.”
During Tuesday’s White House press conference, press secretary Sean Spicer declined to comment specifically on Gorsuch’s comments.
Despite Gorsuch’s seemingly neutral responses on the abortion rights case, Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said in a statement on Tuesday that Gorsuch issued “non-answers” on the abortion questions, and that his record as an anti-abortion judge sets expectations for Gorsuch’s behavior if confirmed.
“Gorsuch’s record gives us all the clues we need to conclude that he will be the justice that Trump promised—one who will vote to overturn this popular precedent. The stakes are too high,” Hogue said. “A ‘no’ vote is not enough for the Americans who stand to lose so much if Judge Gorsuch makes it to the bench. Senate Democrats must filibuster this nominee.”
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.