- Professor writes article defending ‘Asian romantic preference’—and no one is here for it 2 Years Ago
- Ditch Pornhub and support adult content creators instead 2 Years Ago
- Fans grieve Kyoto Animation Studio fire with #PrayforKyoAni 2 Years Ago
- Netflix’s ‘Secret Obsession’ isn’t just terrible—it’s boring as hell Today 3:30 PM
- Instagram expands experiment of hiding likes to 6 more countries Today 3:20 PM
- Man asks woman to stop speaking Spanish on a plane—and bystanders start speaking Spanish Today 12:55 PM
- Schumer calls on FBI, FTC to investigate FaceApp Today 12:41 PM
- Netflix loses subscribers—but hopes some tentpole shows can save it Today 12:10 PM
- Man utterly roasted for saying women can’t ask for equality in revealing clothing Today 12:07 PM
- Instagram struggles to remove photos of Bianca Devins’ dead body Today 11:14 AM
- ‘Storm Area 51’ creator says its gotten so big he’s worried about the FBI Today 10:49 AM
- Everyone loves Q baby, the baby who apparently supports QAnon Today 9:53 AM
- Thread about ‘depression meals’ is inspiring lots of relatable answers Today 9:36 AM
- How long is ‘Avengers: Infinity War’? Today 9:30 AM
- Rand Paul ripped for halting 9/11 Victim Fund re-authorization bill Today 9:18 AM
Neil Gorsuch would have ‘walked out’ if Trump asked him to overturn Roe v. Wade
‘It’s not what judges do.’
President Donald Trump has been clear about his intentions to confirm an anti-abortion Supreme Court judge to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, but his own nomination may not necessarily fit the bill.
On Tuesday during his confirmation hearing, Supreme Court Justice nominee Neil Gorsuch told South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham that if Trump asked him to overturn Roe v. Wade, he would have “walked out the door.”
Graham had asked Gorsuch if he had met Trump personally. When Gorsuch replied he had during his interview, Graham asked if Trump asked him to overrule the abortion rights case, which Gorsuch denied.
“I would have walked out the door. It’s not what judges do,” Gorsuch said pointedly. “I don’t do it on that end of Pennsylvania Avenue, and they shouldn’t do it at this end either, respectfully.”
Earlier in the day, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and California Sen. Dianne Feinstein pressed Gorsuch on the precedent of Roe v. Wade, considering the president’s promise for a judge who would overturn the ruling.
“[Roe v. Wade] is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It has been reaffirmed,” Gorsuch said. “A good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court, worthy of treatment as precedent, like any other.”
During Tuesday’s White House press conference, press secretary Sean Spicer declined to comment specifically on Gorsuch’s comments.
Despite Gorsuch’s seemingly neutral responses on the abortion rights case, Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said in a statement on Tuesday that Gorsuch issued “non-answers” on the abortion questions, and that his record as an anti-abortion judge sets expectations for Gorsuch’s behavior if confirmed.
“Gorsuch’s record gives us all the clues we need to conclude that he will be the justice that Trump promised—one who will vote to overturn this popular precedent. The stakes are too high,” Hogue said. “A ‘no’ vote is not enough for the Americans who stand to lose so much if Judge Gorsuch makes it to the bench. Senate Democrats must filibuster this nominee.”
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.