- Sri Lankan government shuts down social media in wake of deadly blasts Sunday 7:56 PM
- Amazon Flex drivers now must use selfies to verify identity Sunday 6:34 PM
- #GentrifyingGeorge thinks 152-year-old HBCU should ‘just move’ Sunday 5:27 PM
- Watch out! Tonight’s episode of ‘Game of Thrones’ leaked online (updated) Sunday 3:32 PM
- Videos of people working may be the best thing on TikTok right now Sunday 1:46 PM
- How to watch ‘Game of Thrones’ season 8, episode 2 for free Sunday 7:00 AM
- Gendry is making a new weapon for Arya Stark—but what is it? Sunday 6:30 AM
- The live-action Halo series could be Showtime’s most ambitious project yet Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to watch Turner Classic Movies for free Sunday 5:30 AM
- How to watch Real Madrid vs. Athletic Bilbao online for free Sunday 5:00 AM
- ‘Star Trek’s Jonathan Frakes calls out your lies with this new meme Saturday 3:46 PM
- #JusticeForLucca trends after video shows police slam Black teen’s head into pavement Saturday 3:11 PM
- The internet is shocked to learn that Goombas do, in fact, have arms Saturday 2:02 PM
- PayPal, GoFundMe cut off armed militia that detains migrants at border Saturday 1:16 PM
- Barnwood theft may be on the rise because of ‘Fixer Upper’—and fans aren’t having it Saturday 12:23 PM
Law enforcement using Google location history to find potential suspects
Ingo Joseph/Pexels (CC-BY-SA)
Police departments are reportedly using Google’s data on its users’ location history to find potential crime suspects in the absence of other information, prompting concerns that it could potentially affect innocent people.
Google’s program, which employees call Sensorvault, is a database holding location information on “hundreds of millions” of devices around the world. It’s become a go-to for law enforcement officers trying to track down suspects, especially in crime scenes that lack other evidence, according to a New York Times report.
The program was not originally designed for law enforcement, Google employees told the Times—it’s often used to target advertising to consumers—but has since become popular among federal and local agencies.
Despite the murky nature of the use of such information, law enforcement considers this a “game changer,” and officers reportedly resort to it even though it can take Google between four weeks to a few months to access the data, according to the report.
The demand for the technology has spiked especially in the last six months, Google employees told the Times, though it’s not clear why.
While such information has traditionally been requested by law enforcement for specific suspects, this technology allows officers to reverse-engineer the process, pinning down suspects based on their location at a certain time.
But it doesn’t provide the full picture. “It doesn’t pop out the answer like a ticker tape, saying this guy’s guilty,” Washington state prosecutor Gary Ernsdorff, who has been involved in cases that required such warrants, told the Times. “We’re not going to charge anybody just because Google said they were there.”
But there is persistent concern that relying on the data could law enforcement with the wrong suspect, even among some Google employees, who did not expect the technology to be used this way. Brian McClendon, who was instrumental in the development and processing of Google Maps, told the Times that the way law enforcement is currently using it is like a “fishing expedition.”
In fact, the Times report specifically centers around the wrongful arrest of Jorge Molina, an Arizona man who was jailed for almost a week because law enforcement found his data at a crime scene, as well as security video footage of a car that matched Molina’s. They eventually released him and arrested his mother’s ex-boyfriend, who would often use his car.
This single case shows both the downside and upside of a technology like this. While it’s been long known that tech giants are using our data in ways we don’t know, Google’s Sensorvault provides another frightening situation—where the best case scenario is accurately solving a mystery, and the worst case could infringe on the rights of an innocent person.
H/T New York Times
Samira Sadeque is a New York-based journalist reporting on immigration, sexual violence, and mental health, and will sometimes write about memes and dinosaurs too. Her work also appears in Reuters, NPR, and NBC among other publications. She graduated from Columbia Journalism School, and her work has been nominated for SAJA awards. Follow: @Samideque