- Fans call out Madonna for edited Eurovision video Tuesday 9:36 PM
- Partnered Twitch streamer temporarily banned for airing troll’s racist message Tuesday 8:45 PM
- Reddit theory says fans are wrong about who won ‘Game of Thrones’ Tuesday 6:52 PM
- Elon Musk hires ‘absolute unit’ sheep meme creator to be Tesla’s social media manager Tuesday 6:12 PM
- Jason Momoa stands by his Khaleesi after the ‘Game of Thrones’ finale Tuesday 4:05 PM
- Airbnb, 23andMe partner for creepy heritage travel recommendations Tuesday 3:26 PM
- Rep. Katie Porter goes viral again for trouncing Ben Carson (updated) Tuesday 3:26 PM
- This deepfake takes Bill Hader’s Schwarzenegger impression to the next level Tuesday 2:58 PM
- Wanda Sykes rails against Trump and offers much-needed perspective in ‘Not Normal’ Tuesday 2:41 PM
- Man arrested after allegedly threatening to shoot YouTube employees Tuesday 2:13 PM
- Some House Dems are backing away from the Save the Internet Act Tuesday 1:40 PM
- Thousands sign petition calling for Danny DeVito to play Wolverine Tuesday 1:02 PM
- Jason Mitchell fired from ‘Desperados’ and ‘The Chi’ after misconduct allegations Tuesday 12:36 PM
- Police raid Black woman’s house after white neighbor complains about loud Malcolm X speeches Tuesday 12:20 PM
- ‘Transfixed’ says it’s a ‘breakthrough’ series, but it still fetishizes trans bodies Tuesday 11:04 AM
Inside the Web’s $156 billion invisible industry
No one really knows how the data miners are collecting the mass of information they have on consumers, how much they know, or who’s buying it.
BY MEGHAN NEAL
Data brokers, the companies that track our every move and then sell private details about our personalities to businesses, have become a $156 billion industry—that’s more than half of the entire Internet ecosystem—and it’s almost completely invisible. No one really knows how the data miners are collecting the mass of information they have on consumers, how much they know, or who’s buying it. That’s a lot of money and intel swirling around “behind a veil of secrecy,” as a new government report put it.
The Senate commerce committee published today the result of a year-long investigation into the data commerce business. It found that brokers are amassing a huge amount of detailed private data on consumers, and worse, they’re doing it unbeknownst to their targets. This, the government has some beef with.
By now most of us are aware that marketers know a lot about us—our name, email, home address, age and all that, plus our illnesses, hobbies, pets, Facebook friends, favorite YouTube video, how often we shop, how much we spend, and what kind of credit card we use. The report reveals that data brokers also take this knowledge and use it lump us into buckets outlining our financial situation: “Rural and Barely Making It” or “Consumers With Transitory Lifestyles.” They also gives us ratings—”Established Elite,” “American Royalty,” or “Just Sailing Along”—and note if a consumer is especially gullible or open to a get-rich-quick scheme.
Via the report
It’s enough to make you curious what your own underground marketing profile looks like, but of course there’s no way to know. That’s precisely what’s worrying some people in Washington. Today’s Senate report is just the latest probe into the clandestine world of data brokers. The Federal Trade Commission also has a study coming out, and the Government Accountability Office recently released a report calling for legislators to keep the data marketplace in check. There are also a few different consumer privacy initiatives brewing in Washington. For one, FTC head Julie Brill has proposed a “Reclaim Your Name” portal where consumers can see a complete picture of all the personal information on them the hundreds of broker companies have—a plan she admits would be logistically hard to pull off.
For its part, the de facto data broker trade group Direct Marketing Association argues that the government should leave it alone and enjoy the multiple billions of dollars it’s contributing to the U.S. economy. Still, the mounting pleas for more transparency aren’t totally falling on deaf ears.
One of the biggest data broker companies, Acxiom, launched a website earlier this year that lets Web users look up what it has on them. Motherboard’s Derek Mead tested it out and found that the company actually knew surprisingly little about him, and got some of it wrong. It makes you wonder if Acxiom is revealing the whole picture or just the tip of the data iceberg. I suspect the latter is true, especially considering the company refused to tell the Feds where it gets their dirt on people or who it’s selling it to.
Read the full story on Motherboard.
Map of who’s tracking you online via Mozilla Lightbeam/Flickr