- Kanye faces backlash for headlining Christian event with anti-LGBTQ leaders 4 Years Ago
- Why is Yennefer of Vengerberg so different in Netflix’s ‘The Witcher’? 4 Years Ago
- Actress slammed for ‘acid attack-face’ TikTok challenge Today 9:46 AM
- ‘Weathering With You’ blends fantasy and realism in a magical love story Saturday 6:18 PM
- Kidnapped teen used Snapchat to get rescued Saturday 4:35 PM
- What fans do and don’t want to see in future ‘Far Cry’ installments Saturday 4:26 PM
- Aaron Carter accused of stealing lion art for merch Saturday 3:10 PM
- Instagram’s hidden like counts were inspired by a ‘Black Mirror’ episode Saturday 2:06 PM
- Student says they were expelled for tricking teacher into making inappropriate TikTok Saturday 12:26 PM
- Space Force uniforms relentlessly mocked, memed Saturday 10:52 AM
- Man flamed after admitting he called police on Target employee over a toothbrush Saturday 9:10 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Vivir Dos Veces’ searches for a last chance at first love Saturday 8:00 AM
- Camila Cabello must do more about her racist history Saturday 6:00 AM
- Instagram and Facebook are reportedly blocking queer ads Friday 8:58 PM
- Review: Tyler Perry’s ‘A Fall From Grace’ is both nonsensical and utterly predictable Friday 6:48 PM
Based on all the anti-GMO, anti-vaccine, and generally anti-science sentiment on the Web these days, you might think that most Americans oppose scientific progress. But a new Pew survey on Americans’ attitudes about advances in biotechnology suggests something different.
Pew interviewed Americans about their views on various uses of biomedicine. Most people (85 percent) said that they opposed the idea of using genetic-modification techniques to improve a baby’s intelligence, but 46 percent approved of using genetic modification to reduce the risk of serious disease.
On the whole, people were more supportive of using bioengineering to manufacture organs for transplant. Approximately three-quarters of Americans (74 percent) thought that the practice was an appropriate use of medical advances.
More than two-thirds of respondents (68 percent) said that childhood vaccines should be mandatory, whereas 30 percent said that parents should be allowed to decide. (Nearly everyone in a population must be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity to protect those too weak or too young for vaccines.) Younger adults were more likely to think vaccines should be optional. But 83 percent of U.S. adults considered vaccines to be generally safe.
It’s hard to say whether the numbers reflect the perception of anti-science sentiment on the Internet or if people who oppose things like genetic modification and vaccines are simply really good at spreading their messages (even if that message is ultimately disregarded). Conspiratorial and skeptical tweets resonate, because they reflect a very natural distrust of certain aspects of medicine.
The current controversy over gene-editing research harkens back to the controversy over cloning. When scientists cloned Dolly the sheep in 1996, it led people to worry about what might happen if we began cloning humans. That concern has largely died down; the same might happen with gene editing.
Meanwhile, the public has always distrusted vaccines at some level since their inception.
Photo via Linda Bartlett/Wikimedia (PD)
Cynthia McKelvey covered the health and science for the Daily Dot until 2017. She earned a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California Santa Cruz in 2014. Her work has appeared in Gizmodo, Scientific American Mind, and Mic.com.