- How to watch ‘Avenue 5’ 1 Year Ago
- 7 fortune-telling sites for when you’re bored 1 Year Ago
- Governor bans sex puns on free condom wrappers 1 Year Ago
- Is Justin Bieber’s ‘Yummy’ video secretly about Pizzagate? Today 1:01 PM
- Woah Vicky rips out her hair in botched cultural appropriation attempt Today 12:30 PM
- Here’s an exclusive look at ‘Weathering With You’ Today 11:57 AM
- TikTok dudes are dipping their balls in soy sauce for ‘science’ Today 11:49 AM
- Pete Buttigieg’s denial of fixing bread prices becomes its own meme Today 11:10 AM
- Houston Astros get torched with buzzer memes after new revelation Today 10:41 AM
- Teens are eating cereal out of each other’s mouths for clout Today 10:34 AM
- Did Martha McSally plan her ‘liberal hack’ viral moment? Today 10:32 AM
- Trump adds Jeffrey Epstein’s old attorney to impeachment team Today 10:03 AM
- YouTube star Cameron Dallas gets scathing reviews for his Broadway debut Today 9:58 AM
- How to watch ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’ season 10 Today 9:55 AM
- George Lucas met Baby Yoda, and we can’t handle it Today 8:45 AM
Why isn’t ‘The Crimes of Grindelwald’ about Grindelwald doing crimes?
A political rally in a Parisian crypt isn’t really a crime.
This post includes spoilers for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald.
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald leaves the audience with a lot of questions. What’s up with Credence’s backstory? Did Leta really love Theseus? Also, why wasn’t this movie about, you know, the actual crimes of Grindelwald?
Think about it. Sure, Grindelwald does commit some crimes, but no more than your average Harry Potter villain. He’s actually lying low by Grindelwald standards, spending most of the movie chilling in a Parisian townhouse and letting his followers do the dirty work.
Oddly enough, Grindelwald’s biggest crimes happened before the franchise began. Fantastic Beasts opened with Grindelwald as an international fugitive, and ended with his arrest. The Crimes of Grindelwald begins with him escaping prison (definitely a crime) and then ordering his followers to kill a muggle family (also undeniably a crime) so he can steal their apartment (crime). But if you’re an infamous supervillain, is that really enough crimes to warrant a whole movie title? I don’t see the X-Men franchise subtitling anything The Crimes of Magneto.
Grindelwald’s big moment at the end is a political rally in a Parisian crypt, which is presumably illegal, except the Aurors are oddly reticent about actually arresting him. One Auror even points out that it’s not against the law for people to listen to him; a dig at free speech purists who think neo-Nazis should be allowed on TV debates. Grindelwald does admittedly commit some murders at the rally, but in the annals of Harry Potter villains, that’s still not especially notable. Bellatrix Lestrange probably had a higher body count.
If anything, the idea of “crime” in a crime-and-punishment sense is more relevant to the heroes. Grindelwald may be evil, but Newt Scamander and his friends are more in danger of arrest. Highlighting the idea of the Wizarding World as a restrictive police state, Jacob and Queenie face arrest or memory-wipes for being in a muggle/witch relationship. Newt smuggles himself illegally across the English Channel, and Dumbledore has to wear Ministry-issue magical handcuffs for most of the movie. They’re all criminals, in the eyes of the inhumane 1920s legal system.
Looking back, The Crimes of Grindelwald now seems like a cool-sounding title that doesn’t actually make sense. The Rise of Grindelwald would be more appropriate, although as my colleague Michelle pointed out, maybe the true Crimes of Grindelwald were the friends they made along the way.
Gavia Baker-Whitelaw is a staff writer at the Daily Dot, covering geek culture and fandom. Specializing in sci-fi movies and superheroes, she also appears as a film and TV critic on BBC radio. Elsewhere, she co-hosts the pop culture podcast Overinvested. Follow her on Twitter: @Hello_Tailor