- How to stream Packers vs. Lions on Monday Night Football Sunday 7:15 PM
- College students burned author’s books after she spoke about white privilege Sunday 6:28 PM
- Texas police officer fatally shoots Black woman in her own home Sunday 3:44 PM
- Milo Yiannopoulos’ website dangerous.com was sold Sunday 1:42 PM
- First YouTube comment to hit 1 million likes is on Billie Eilish’s ‘bad guy’ music video Sunday 12:36 PM
- Girl says she was fired over exposing how Panera makes its mac and cheese on TikTok Sunday 11:34 AM
- David Harbour teased fans about Hopper’s ‘Stranger Things’ fate on ‘SNL’ Sunday 10:24 AM
- Kacey Musgraves accused of cultural appropriation–and botching it Sunday 9:19 AM
- Rihanna defends Vogue writer who received backlash for ‘winging’ interview Sunday 8:36 AM
- Here are the best PC games to add to your list Sunday 8:20 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 8 Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to stream Steelers vs. Chargers on Sunday Night Football Saturday 7:20 PM
- Popular TikTok teens accused of pretending to be gay for clout Saturday 6:38 PM
- Scott Walker’s ‘$26 haircut’ dig at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez backfires Saturday 4:46 PM
- Halle synagogue shooter allegedly posted manifesto on anime message board Saturday 4:06 PM
U.K. government presses New York Times editor for Snowden files
A partnership with the Guardian over the NSA leaks brought some unwelcome attention.
In August, New York Times Executive Editor Jill Abramson accepted an invitation from U.K. newspaper the Guardian to collaborate on combing through secret files leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden—reprising a professional partnership forged over WikiLeaks material in 2010. Not long after, Abramson revealed yesterday in a Guardian interview, someone from the British embassy came knocking.
“They were hopeful that we would relinquish any material that we might be reporting on, relating to Edward Snowden,” Abramson explained. Particularly sought after were leaked files that revealed activities of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain’s version of the NSA. But the unnamed official went home disappointed. “Needless to say,” Abramson remarked, “I considered what they told me, and said no.”
The encounter is a striking example of how governments on both sides of the pond have moved to suppress or otherwise control the flow of state surveillance data collected in the name of the war on terror. Abramson was adamant that the embassy not determine what the Times made public about the NSA or its influence over the GCHQ, though as the Guardian notes, the newspaper has submitted to White House pressures on occasion.
“Within the U.S., the Obama administration has asked on several occasions for the New York Times to consider withholding certain information from its stories, and the paper always gives sober consideration to the requests, she said, based on a careful assessment of the possible damage to national security accruing from publication. ‘Our default position is usually to weigh on the side of informing the public.'”
Beyond bargaining with the Times directly, the Obama administration has been attacking leaks at their root, prosecuting whistleblowers with an aggression that harks back to the Nixon era. With it that much more dangerous to become a source, a chilling effect on journalism is inevitable. It’s a lot easier to intimidate outspoken individuals than the gray lady.
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'