- Warren calls for harsh penalties for tech companies that spread voter disinformation 7 Years Ago
- ‘Vanderpump Rules’ recap: Miami vices and vexes 7 Years Ago
- Teen gets harmonica stuck in mouth, documents it on TikTok Today 11:08 AM
- Joey Salads got his DNA results in and now he’s tweeting the N-word Today 10:58 AM
- NikkieTutorials says she knows who blackmailed her Today 10:22 AM
- Seth Rogen is making a movie about a deadly meme Today 9:30 AM
- Ring should be shut down ‘immediately,’ Amazon engineer warns Today 9:19 AM
- Joe Biden wants his own Bernie Bros Today 8:57 AM
- Twitch star Adept shares heartwarming story about meeting Kobe Bryant Today 8:44 AM
- ‘Promising Young Woman’ unravels the complexities of a revenge fantasy Today 8:35 AM
- Review: ‘Next in Fashion’ is Netflix’s latest attempt at reality TV Today 7:00 AM
- What is Byte, and can it really compete with TikTok? Today 7:00 AM
- Migrants are under social media surveillance—and that’s a problem for everyone Today 6:00 AM
- Gabrielle Union deserves better from Terry Crews Tuesday 11:12 PM
- T.I. publicly apologizes to daughters after Kobe Bryant’s death Tuesday 8:46 PM
Instagram files to dismiss Terms of Service lawsuit
Instagram’s lawyers have filed to dismissed a user’s lawsuit over the company’s controversial terms of service changes, arguing that the user has the facts all wrong.
Instagram claimed the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the photo-sharing service has no right to bring her claim over Terms of Service (ToS) changes to court, as she could have simply deleted her account.
In a filing, Instagram asked a federal court to dismiss the class action lawsuit, filed in December in San Francisco. Lucy Funes, among other claims, accused Instagram of breach of contract when it changed its ToS, according to Reuters.
The Facebook-owned service updated the ToS in December to include a section which would have forced users to agree that any company could pay Instagram to “display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.” The section effectively granted Instagram the ability to use the same kind of social advertising seen in its parent company’s service.
Funes sued Instagram on Dec. 21, though continued to use the service after that point, according to Instagram. In the filing, Instagram said Funes could have stopped sharing photos on the service before the modified ToS came into effect on Jan. 19.
The firm also denied Funes’s arguments that the ToS required her to transfer the rights to her photos to Instagram, which has always made it clear that users retain copyright over their photos. Instagram noted that both versions of the ToS explicitly point this out.
Photo by @ivansly/Instagram
Based in Montreal, Kris Holt has been writing about technology and web culture since 2010. He writes for Engadget and Tech News World, and his byline has also appeared in Paste, Salon, International Business Times, Mashable, and elsewhere.