- ‘Game of Thrones’ failed women—and it’s a shame on its legacy Today 7:40 AM
- How to use Tor, the network that lets you browse the web anonymously Today 7:30 AM
- How to live stream Devin Haney vs. Antonio Moran on DAZN Today 7:00 AM
- Trump’s transphobic policies are disgusting—but they aren’t new Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Copa del Rey Final online for free Today 5:45 AM
- How to watch the DFB-Pokal final for free Today 5:30 AM
- Curvy Wife Guy drops music video for rap song ‘Chubby Sexy’ Friday 7:33 PM
- A ‘Black Mirror’ spinoff mini-series is coming to YouTube via Netflix Latin America Friday 5:56 PM
- Kanye West appears on David Letterman’s Netflix show to talk Trump, TMZ, and Drake Friday 3:27 PM
- QAnon believers link small-town arrest to deep state conspiracy without evidence Friday 1:58 PM
- Instagram photos showing prison conditions spark massive protest Friday 1:33 PM
- ‘Gay rat wedding’ headline sparks amazing new meme Friday 1:03 PM
- ‘I read a gossip piece’ meme mocks Moby’s Instagram post Friday 12:39 PM
- Rotten Tomatoes wants to see your ticket stub to leave a verified review Friday 11:46 AM
- ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ movie delayed to 2020 to fix his look Friday 11:39 AM
Instagram’s lawyers have filed to dismissed a user’s lawsuit over the company’s controversial terms of service changes, arguing that the user has the facts all wrong.
Instagram claimed the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the photo-sharing service has no right to bring her claim over Terms of Service (ToS) changes to court, as she could have simply deleted her account.
In a filing, Instagram asked a federal court to dismiss the class action lawsuit, filed in December in San Francisco. Lucy Funes, among other claims, accused Instagram of breach of contract when it changed its ToS, according to Reuters.
The Facebook-owned service updated the ToS in December to include a section which would have forced users to agree that any company could pay Instagram to “display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.” The section effectively granted Instagram the ability to use the same kind of social advertising seen in its parent company’s service.
Funes sued Instagram on Dec. 21, though continued to use the service after that point, according to Instagram. In the filing, Instagram said Funes could have stopped sharing photos on the service before the modified ToS came into effect on Jan. 19.
The firm also denied Funes’s arguments that the ToS required her to transfer the rights to her photos to Instagram, which has always made it clear that users retain copyright over their photos. Instagram noted that both versions of the ToS explicitly point this out.
Photo by @ivansly/Instagram
Based in Montreal, Kris Holt has been writing about technology and web culture since 2010. He writes for Engadget and Tech News World, and his byline has also appeared in Paste, Salon, International Business Times, Mashable, and elsewhere.