- What you need to know about DVR on DirecTV Now 6 Years Ago
- How to stream Hulu’s ‘The Act’ free Today 5:00 AM
- Devin Nunes’ lawsuit with Twitter over parody accounts inspires more parody accounts Tuesday 7:53 PM
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez posts SpongeBob meme to diss Green New Deal adversaries Tuesday 7:23 PM
- Twitter blasts Benny Johnson over heinous Native American ‘socialist’ reservations take Tuesday 6:16 PM
- New Zealand arrests 2 for sharing video of mosque shooting Tuesday 4:44 PM
- ‘Queer Eye’ season 3 serves more frothy fun and cathartic realness Tuesday 4:30 PM
- Everyone is roasting this photo of Kourtney Kardashian in a bubble bath Tuesday 4:15 PM
- White House report has a lot of superheroes listed as interns Tuesday 4:06 PM
- Google to launch ‘Stadia’ cloud gaming service this year Tuesday 3:55 PM
- Amy Schumer addresses her ‘Growing’ pains in new Netflix special Tuesday 2:04 PM
- This Bitcoin tie is everyone’s favorite part of the Theranos documentary Tuesday 1:56 PM
- Trump’s social media guru gets suspended on Facebook Tuesday 1:51 PM
- YouTube time traveler says he saw a dinosaur—in the future Tuesday 1:47 PM
- Why is Netflix changing the viewing order for ‘Love, Death & Robots’? Tuesday 12:47 PM
Instagram’s lawyers have filed to dismissed a user’s lawsuit over the company’s controversial terms of service changes, arguing that the user has the facts all wrong.
Instagram claimed the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the photo-sharing service has no right to bring her claim over Terms of Service (ToS) changes to court, as she could have simply deleted her account.
In a filing, Instagram asked a federal court to dismiss the class action lawsuit, filed in December in San Francisco. Lucy Funes, among other claims, accused Instagram of breach of contract when it changed its ToS, according to Reuters.
The Facebook-owned service updated the ToS in December to include a section which would have forced users to agree that any company could pay Instagram to “display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.” The section effectively granted Instagram the ability to use the same kind of social advertising seen in its parent company’s service.
Funes sued Instagram on Dec. 21, though continued to use the service after that point, according to Instagram. In the filing, Instagram said Funes could have stopped sharing photos on the service before the modified ToS came into effect on Jan. 19.
The firm also denied Funes’s arguments that the ToS required her to transfer the rights to her photos to Instagram, which has always made it clear that users retain copyright over their photos. Instagram noted that both versions of the ToS explicitly point this out.
Photo by @ivansly/Instagram
Based in Montreal, Kris Holt has been writing about technology and web culture since 2010. He writes for Engadget and Tech News World, and his byline has also appeared in Paste, Salon, International Business Times, Mashable, and elsewhere.