- UPS facing backlash for thanking police after employee killed in shootout Saturday 5:02 PM
- Sanders campaign fires staffer after anti-Semitic, homophobic tweets surface Saturday 3:13 PM
- Brother Nature was attacked, says everyone just watched with phones out Saturday 2:45 PM
- Ryan Reynolds’ gin company hires Peloton wife for ad Saturday 1:24 PM
- Ex-vegan YouTuber accused of fraud after following meat-only diet Saturday 1:11 PM
- The 15 best Disney+ hidden gems and deep cuts Saturday 12:23 PM
- Everyone in GoFundMe scam involving homeless veteran has now pleaded guilty Saturday 12:06 PM
- Boy invites kindergarten class to his adoption–and people are emotional Saturday 11:56 AM
- Reddit links leaked trade deal documents to Russian campaign Saturday 10:44 AM
- How to stream Alistair Overeem vs. Jairzinho Rozenstruik Saturday 8:30 AM
- Amazon sends customers condoms and soap instead of Nintendo Switch Saturday 8:28 AM
- How to live stream Jermall Charlo vs. Dennis Hogan Saturday 8:00 AM
- Apple TV’s ‘Truth Be Told’ is a criminally dull drama Saturday 6:00 AM
- Thousands of Uber users have reported sexual assaults, company says Friday 5:40 PM
- ‘Astronomy Club’ reformats the sketch show Friday 4:58 PM
Cellphone cameras are powerful weapons.
Fit neatly into millions of pockets, the newly ubiquitous technology has deeply impacted how Americans talk about police.
From video of Eric Garner dying while in an NYPD choke hold to Walter Scott being shot in the back and killed, instant access to recording devices has put an intense spotlight on police behavior in the U.S.
Ostensibly designed to prevent filming in places like concerts or classified facilities, the new tech could provide governments around the world the ability to shut down cellphone cameras without any apparent transparency.
Apple has not responded to a request for comment.
Cellphone video cameras have become iconic tools of protest around the globe. In the U.S., the technology’s prominent role in a new discussion about police brutality has led to invocations of God at their mention.
“[The police] used to be able to get away with lying about it,” Baltimore lawyer William Murphy, Jr., attorney to the family of Freddie Gray, said last year after Gray died in police custody. “And there were lots of people in the establishment anxious to believe them over anybody black. Thank God for cellphone video cameras. Thank God for cellphone video cameras, because now the truth is finally coming out. And it’s ugly.”
In 2014, cops tried to delete a video from the phone of Kianga Mwamba after she recorded police beating a handcuffed man, then arrested her and took her to jail. The video, deleted off the device by the officers, was backed up online, and caused her charges to be dropped. But the incident raises serious questions about whether police ought to have so much power over a device being used as a tool of transparency and, sometimes, accountability.
FBI Director James Comey said last month he believes a “viral video effect” may hurt U.S. police work and may be “at the heart” of the rise of violent crime in some American cities.
“There’s a perception that police are less likely to do the marginal additional policing that suppresses crime—the getting out of your car at 2 in the morning and saying to a group of guys, ‘Hey, what are you doing here?’” he told reporters at Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters.
Comey provided no statistical proof linking cellphone video camera to crime rates and only singled out a few American cities but stayed silent on the majority of cities that experienced no uptick in crime.
Overall, however, violent crime is not rising, recent congressional analysis found.
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.