- Is that Rosa Parks in random Twitter user’s baby photo? Tuesday 8:24 PM
- Syracuse students say white supremacist manifesto was AirDropped to them Tuesday 7:44 PM
- Florida woman gets prison time for throwing slushie at Matt Gaetz Tuesday 6:28 PM
- Marie Kondo’s online store slammed for selling clutter-worthy products Tuesday 5:34 PM
- People are rallying against toxic masculinity on International Men’s Day Tuesday 4:42 PM
- Reddit wants to stop its pro-Trump forum from outing the alleged whistleblower Tuesday 3:38 PM
- White woman calls cops on man who said he was visiting aunt with his kids Tuesday 3:12 PM
- ‘The Stranded’ is a flawed yet addictive blend of ‘Degrassi’ and ‘Lost’ Tuesday 2:45 PM
- The ‘gonna tell my kids’ meme is revisionist history at its most absurd Tuesday 2:24 PM
- Redditor asks former burglars to give home security tips Tuesday 2:18 PM
- Facebook-Breitbart partnership under fire in wake of new Stephen Miller emails Tuesday 2:00 PM
- John Krasinski under fire after praising the CIA Tuesday 1:46 PM
- Conservatives melt down after Chick-fil-A says it will stop donating to anti-LGBTQ orgs Tuesday 1:33 PM
- ‘Honey Boy’ is an experimental look at channeling trauma Tuesday 1:28 PM
- Disney+ now allows users to resume and restart content Tuesday 11:42 AM
Twitter’s new rules were introduced last month and deal with “abuse and hateful conduct” as well as “violence and physical harm.” The two categories found in Twitter’s controversial rules were expanded to punish hate speech included in user’s profiles (not just in the tweets they post) and any user’s affiliation with groups that use or celebrate violence.
The policy on violence already stated that specific threats of violence or the wish for serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual will result in a permanent suspension. The new rules go after accounts that affiliate themselves with organizations that promote violence against civilians to further their cause.
However, there is one notable exception to the rule: government entities.
Twitter’s new rules don’t apply to “military or government entities” and group that “are currently engaging in (or have engaged in) peaceful resolution,” the company wrote in a blog post today. It added that “groups with representatives elected to public office through democratic elections” are protected.
Just heard Foreign Minister of North Korea speak at U.N. If he echoes thoughts of Little Rocket Man, they won't be around much longer!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2017
The exception seemingly gives President Trump the ability to continue to tweet threats to other countries, despite their clear violation of Twitter’s rules. In September, Trump threatened North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, calling him “Little rocket man” and declaring his country “won’t be around much longer.” Twitter justified its decision not to punish Trump by citing a mysterious rule that protects “newsworthy” tweets.
Twitter has been criticized for failing to punish Trump after he made threats and retweeted violent videos. Its latest blunder was failing to explain why violent videos Trump retweeted, one of which appears to show a teenage boy being beaten to death, remained on the site. Since the new rule went into effect, Twitter suspended the two accounts that posted violent videos.
The other rule change lets Twitter permanently suspend accounts if their profile image or header includes “hateful images or symbols,” like Nazi swastikas. It will also start policing account information, including usernames, display names, and profile bios—not just tweets—for targeted harassment or expressing hate toward a person, group, or protected category.
Twitter declined to comment on how its policies specifically affect Donald Trump’s account.
Phillip Tracy is a former technology staff writer at the Daily Dot. He's an expert on smartphones, social media trends, and gadgets. He previously reported on IoT and telecom for RCR Wireless News and contributed to NewBay Media magazine. He now writes for Laptop magazine.