- Russian bots targeting Joe Biden on Instagram Monday 10:04 PM
- TikTok takes down 2 dozen ISIS accounts being used for recruitment Monday 9:38 PM
- British judge refuses to delay WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s extradition hearing Monday 8:01 PM
- Indicted Giuliani associate Lev Parnas’ private Instagram filled with Trump connections Monday 7:22 PM
- ‘Bomboclaat’ is the new ‘sco pa tu manaa’ Monday 7:00 PM
- Lori Harvey reportedly trying to walk away from car crash spawns memes Monday 6:00 PM
- In Netflix’s ‘Upstarts,’ Silicon Valley CEOs are the good guys Monday 4:35 PM
- This video of a tree struck by lightning is… relatable? Monday 4:13 PM
- How to watch ‘Keeping Faith’ Monday 3:37 PM
- ‘South Park’ at the center of $500 million streaming war Monday 3:16 PM
- Pizza Hut and Papa John’s employees pranked into talking to each other on the phone Monday 2:34 PM
- Twitter bullies brought Jordan Peterson to tears Monday 2:24 PM
- 25 last-minute Halloween costumes for those with no time to shop Monday 1:30 PM
- Krassensteins return to Twitter and are immediately suspended Monday 1:01 PM
- Tom Brady insists he didn’t parody Robert Kraft in ‘Living with Yourself’ cameo Monday 12:52 PM
Facebook is arguing that it does not have to follow Washington state laws designed to bring transparency to election advertisements, the Stranger reports.
In a letter to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission on Tuesday, the social media giant pushed back against repeated attempts by the Stranger to obtain data on more than two dozen political ads that Facebook sold this year.
Those ads, which related to four Seattle City Council races as well as a ballot measure in the city, are technically violating Facebook’s rules. The social media company banned political ads in Washington state after election ad disclosure laws were made more robust at the beginning of the year.
Despite the strengthened laws and the social media site’s ban, political ads for issues in the Evergreen State persist. Facebook has argued that since its policies restrict such content, they cannot be considered a “commercial advertiser,” therefore exempting them from having to disclose ad data.
The ad disclosure laws give any citizen the right “to receive detailed information on the financing and reach of local political ads that companies such as Facebook sell.” But Facebook has seemingly found a way to continue selling ads while defying local laws.
“In other words: If Facebook has a policy banning local political ads in Washington, and Facebook nevertheless continues to sell local political ads in Washington, then those political ads are not covered by Washington’s disclosure laws, because Facebook has a policy banning them,” the Stranger notes.
The social media site has also cited Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which keeps websites from being held accountable for content users upload or create.
It is still unclear who will come out on top, Facebook or the state of Washington. Both Facebook and Google have already collectively paid $455,000 to settle lawsuits surrounding ad disclosure violations with the state’s attorney general, Bob Ferguson. But “by settling last year’s lawsuits with cash payments but no admissions of guilt,” the Stranger adds, no determination was actually made on whether Facebook can be forced to follow such laws.
Facebook argues in the letter, however, that it “has made a good-faith effort to comply with Washington law.” It is now in the hands of the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission to decide what will happen next.
“If these tech giants can’t actually ban political ads intended to influence local elections in Washington state, what happens if someday a bunch of supposedly banned Facebook or Google ads end up tilting a close race for city council, or school board, or mayor, or state legislature, or state supreme court?” the Stranger asks.
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.