- Cole Carrigan says he left Team 10 after being called homophobic slur 2 Years Ago
- Cop under investigation after implying Ocasio-Cortez should be shot 2 Years Ago
- The ‘Big Little Lies’ finale sucked—but at least we have Renata 2 Years Ago
- Wendy Davis announces she’s running for Congress 2 Years Ago
- Please stop being horny on main for #IceBae and other horrible people Today 10:02 AM
- Illinois Republicans share ‘jihad squad’ meme of 4 Dem congresswomen Today 9:05 AM
- How a deepfake gets made Today 8:25 AM
- How to watch ‘Veronica Mars’ season 4 online Today 8:21 AM
- The MCU’s Phase 4 is all about Marvel getting weird Today 7:07 AM
- How alt porn site SuicideGirls gets women to pose naked for free Today 7:00 AM
- Why did the GOP launch a website hyping socialist candidates? Today 6:30 AM
- The macrophilia and size-change fetish communities are made possible through the magic of the internet Today 6:00 AM
- Is Trump defiling the U.S. flag in this MAGA dude’s artwork? Sunday 4:41 PM
- White woman claims she invented sleep bonnets, selling them for $100 Sunday 4:03 PM
- Even real cats are transfixed by the enigma that is the ‘Cats’ trailer Sunday 3:04 PM
Elon Musk warns that AI could destroy us all, begs governors to take preemptive action
This, um, doesn’t sound good.
Speaking at the National Governors Association Summer Meeting in Providence, Rhode Island this week, Musk spoke to a group of Democratic and Republican governors, urging them to take proactive action to prepare for the rise of AI. Specifically, he argued that the possible negative effects of AI on human society can’t necessarily be legislated away after they’ve already begun. Instead it requires preemptive regulations and restrictions for the safety of humankind.
“AI is a rare case where I think we need to be proactive in regulation, instead of reactive. Because I think by the time we are reactive in AI regulation, it’s too late,” Must said, via CNet. “AI is a fundamental risk to the existence of human civilization, in a way that car accidents, airplane crashes, faulty drugs, or bad food were not.”
A big part of Musk’s concern is that AI systems could spark needless wars by way of “fake news” and information manipulation, a vision not that far from what fans of The Terminator film franchise have had bouncing through their heads for the last few decades.
Elon Musk told a whole bunch of U.S. governors yesterday to regulate AI. That's a big deal. https://t.co/89bJZVN8nb— Rabbi Steven Burg (@stevenburg) July 16, 2017
But Musk fervently believes this is a real threat, not something isolated to the realms of science fiction. And while he believes that the general public doesn’t have adequate appreciation for the scale of the threat just yet, he thinks that will change in due time.
“Once there is awareness,” Musk said, “people will be extremely afraid, as they should be.”
This is far from the first time the Tesla and SpaceX CEO has made dire public warnings about the threats associated with artificial intelligence. In 2014, he cautioned about the perils of rapid AI advancement in a speech to students at MIT. Said Musk then:
I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess at what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. So, we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence. I’m increasingly inclined to think there should be some regulatory oversight at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish. With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. You know, in all those stories where there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, and he’s like yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon. Didn’t work out.
He’s been joined in these concerns by other prominent thinkers in the world of tech and science, namely Microsoft founder Bill Gates and world-renowned theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking.
Chris Tognotti is a frequent contributor for the Daily Dot. He’s a news and current events writer based out of Berkeley, California, and a co-host of the podcast Now We Know. While he specializes in domestic politics and opinion writing, he’s also savvy on sports, video games, and film.