- Twitter lifts ‘permanent’ suspension of activist Barrett Brown Monday 5:52 PM
- Billie Eilish fans fend off objectifying comments on tank top photo Monday 5:32 PM
- Groom’s mother sabotages wedding by tricking guests into wearing jorts and hoodies Monday 4:39 PM
- No one believes Bill de Blasio’s son sent him these debate prep texts Monday 3:26 PM
- Meek Mill, Jay-Z to release ‘Free Meek’ documentary on Amazon Prime Monday 3:20 PM
- 3 ways to secure your Nest cameras Monday 3:15 PM
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters Monday 2:48 PM
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Monday 12:50 PM
- This mom has the perfect nickname for her nonbinary kid Monday 12:25 PM
- Netflix tests pop-out player that will allow viewers to multitask Monday 11:44 AM
- Man allowed to sue media publishers over readers’ Facebook comments Monday 11:42 AM
- Republicans slammed for joke about ‘heavily armed militia’ at Oregon statehouse Monday 11:30 AM
- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth Monday 10:53 AM
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism Monday 10:19 AM
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Monday 9:26 AM
Tweets removed for copyright violations are now labeled as such, rather than just deleted.
Twitter has made a key change to how it handles copyright requests.
Rather than outright removing tweets at the heart of copyright takedown requests, Twitter is instead “withholding” them and adding a placeholder message to the tweet to let everyone know the copyright holder has asked Twitter to remove the content.
Twitter is carrying out the measure as it wants to be as transparent as possible with copyright claims. Its partnership with Chilling Effects ensures that any Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) requests and cease and desist notices it receives are posted to that site for all to see.
Previously, when someone tried to access the individual Web page for a tweet that had been removed for copyright reasons, they’d simply see message indicating “that page doesn’t exist.”
Once Twitter receives a valid DMCA request, it will withhold the tweet(s) in question and display a message reading “This Tweet from [username] has been withheld in response to a report from a copyright holder” along with a link to the help page explaining the policy. When it is a piece of media (photo, video, etc) being withheld, Twitter will post a similar message:
Twitter says it attempts to get in contact with the account holder to let them know it restricted access to the tweet, as GigaOM notes. It offers information on the DMCA request and provides an explanation of how to file a counter notice. A user may have a case if they share the copyrighted content under the auspices of fair use or if they legitimately hold the copyright to the material.
The company will suspend the accounts of repeat violators, and permanently remove accounts in the most serious cases.
The copyright takedown system is one which often lends itself to abuse. YouTube in particular has had to contend with several cases where false copyright complaints have triggered automatic takedowns of videos.
Last year, someone illegitimately claimed copyright over Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga music videos, which were then unavailable on the site for several hours. Automated systems also result in the removal of legitimate content, like a video where the creator held the copyright over the sound of wind and Chrysler’s Super Bowl ad from this year.
Twitter only considers taking down tweets, photos, and videos once the copyright holder has gone through the proper legal channels. Making that process more transparent helps everyone understand exactly how the company processes copyright claims and avoid abuse.
That said, security researcher Mikko Hypponen decided to have a little fun at Twitter’ expense under the new policy. He is one of several people who composed a tweet that made it look as though Twitter had “censored” it.
Photo by ansik/Twitter
Based in Montreal, Kris Holt has been writing about technology and web culture since 2010. He writes for Engadget and Tech News World, and his byline has also appeared in Paste, Salon, International Business Times, Mashable, and elsewhere.