- Why Britons are tweeting ‘Little England’ in wake of the U.K. election Today 3:22 PM
- Net neutrality advocates ask for rehearing on federal court decision Today 2:29 PM
- Americans are sharing their #PrivateHealthLIFEhacks to help Brits Today 2:28 PM
- Warren, Sanders, Yang pledge to skip next week’s debate over union dispute Today 2:12 PM
- How to watch tonight’s Nets vs. Raptors matchup on NBA TV Today 2:00 PM
- Alt-right comedian Owen Benjamin banned from Instagram over anti-Semitic memes Today 1:55 PM
- TikTok teens are procrastinating with #FinalsWeek Today 1:46 PM
- ‘The Mandalorian’ takes on a prison break in episode 6 Today 1:30 PM
- Nick Cannon vs. Eminem battle expected to escalate after ‘off-limits’ daughter diss Today 12:50 PM
- Laura Loomer vehemently denies being author of new Laura Loomer-themed action novel Today 12:30 PM
- PewDiePie’s poop-inspired game gets banned by Apple Today 11:29 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ showrunners to adapt ‘Lovecraft’ graphic novel to screen Today 11:00 AM
- The 50 memes that defined the decade Today 10:45 AM
- Venmo users are getting harassed with fraudulent payment requests Today 10:38 AM
- Twitter pledges to verify politicians in national primaries Today 9:34 AM
Things don’t look good for the Mars One expedition. Dogged by financial problems and reports of poor organization, it’s almost surprising to hear that the project is still going.
Mars One attracted a lot of media attention in 2013 and 2014, as it recruited volunteers for a private mission to Mars. But in recent years its publicity campaign waned, coupled with growing concerns that the project lacked realistic plans. Could it possibly raise enough money to beat established space agencies to Mars, or was Mars One just futuristic snake oil?
A new report from Inverse suggests the latter. After interviewing representatives from SpaceX, NASA, and Lockheed Martin, along with people personally involved with Mars One, Inverse concluded that “the company’s chief officers appear to be recklessly piloting a company in serious financial and strategic crisis.” It looks more and more like Mars One relied on people’s ill-informed optimism about the future of space travel, while failing to get serious funding or build a functional infrastructure for the expedition.
Mars One’s fame was at its peak during the recruitment process for the Mars 100, a shortlist of wannabe space travelers from all walks of life. Inverse spoke to three former contenders and one man who is still on the shortlist. They expressed doubt that the project would ever get off the ground. Trey Carriveaux, a former Navy submariner, was concerned that Mars One’s organizers didn’t understand the logistics of their own mission. For one thing, they claimed to have a relationship with SpaceX, but didn’t. Also, he wasn’t satisfied with their plans for his area of expertise.
“I’m a nuclear reactor operator for the Navy. Power distribution is central to my thoughts,” said Carriveaux. “[Mars One’s] idea of using solar didn’t make much sense because you’d have to have an extensive power storage facility, and they didn’t discuss that.”
Another former contender expressed concern at the mindset of other Mars 100 applicants. At a Mars One meetup, “a lot of people looked at it as their one way out of here.” True believers often seemed depressed or alienated, looking for a way to escape life on Earth.
Meanwhile on the paperwork side, Inverse obtained documents that suggest Mars One has been in debt for years. So if it’s a scam—which its creator Bas Landsdorp denies—it’s certainly not a successful one.
H/T to Inverse
Gavia Baker-Whitelaw is a staff writer at the Daily Dot, covering geek culture and fandom. Specializing in sci-fi movies and superheroes, she also appears as a film and TV critic on BBC radio. Elsewhere, she co-hosts the pop culture podcast Overinvested. Follow her on Twitter: @Hello_Tailor