- Watch Tiffany Pollard sell the sh*t out of Fenty Beauty makeup Monday 8:05 PM
- Speech pathologist sues Texas school district for right to boycott Israel Monday 5:25 PM
- ‘Fresh Prince’ actor sues Fortnite developer for using the Carlton dance Monday 4:40 PM
- 3D-printed head fools Android facial recognition Monday 3:01 PM
- FCC finally releases emails on Ajit Pai’s ‘Harlem Shake’ video Monday 2:33 PM
- Wall Street Journal website hacked with ‘apology’ to PewDiePie Monday 1:26 PM
- YouTube star James Charles feels ‘unsafe’ after home address leaks Monday 12:28 PM
- Jordan Peterson claims he’s building an alternative to Patreon Monday 12:19 PM
- We might finally see a same-sex Barbie set, thanks to this couple’s Instagram post Monday 12:16 PM
- Tumblr’s porn ban is here—and Twitter’s mourning it with memes Monday 11:58 AM
- Facebook blocks article on Yemeni crisis over photo of starving child Monday 11:55 AM
- Netflix reveals all-star voice cast for ‘Dark Crystal’ prequel Monday 11:51 AM
- Netflix warns users to be cautious of new phishing scam Monday 11:04 AM
- 8 last-minute gift ideas that are popular on Amazon Monday 11:00 AM
- PewDiePie takes big lead in subscription race after YouTube deletes spam Monday 10:56 AM
Its terms were so vague that some pinners deleted their boards in tears. Now, Pinterest is clarifying some of its more frightening clauses.
Since the purpose of Pinterest is for users to populate the site with images they do not own, the network has been in a legal gray area ever since users discovered that pinning content from around the Web might be on the wrong side of the law. Pinterest users, concerned that the sites’ vague policies could get them sued or worse, have even been deleting their boards to avoid uncertain punishment from copyright holders and Pinterest itself.
What’s more, few users who expressed their concerns with copyright were about to get a response from Pinterest. Until recently, the network has been skirting the issue, addressing just two bloggers’ concerns with legality.
Now, there should be no ambiguity about any of Pinterest’s policies. The network writes that the new terms, which take effect on April 6, two weeks from the date they were announced, “are easier to understand and better reflect the direction our company is headed in the future.”
In a blog post signed by “Ben [Silbermann] & the Pinterest team,” the social network highlighted a few of the most significant changes:
First, Pinterest has revised its terms to reflect that the site will never attempt to profit off users’ pins. Originally, the Terms stated that Pinterest could sell any content uploaded to the site.
“Selling content was never our intention and we removed this from our updated Terms,” it wrote.
The site also announced new features. Soon, Pinterest wrote, there will be new tools to help copyright holders more easier report infringement. It also wrote in language that will “pave the way” for long-awaited new additions: a Pinterest API to aid developers in creating third-party Pinterest tools, and private pinboards.
Finally, Pinterest encouraged all users to review the terms and write in suggestions to [email protected]. (The Daily Dot is still awaiting a response to the support question we wrote to Pinterest two weeks ago.)
The announcement, which was posted on Tumblr, has netted hundreds of user comments since it was published this afternoon.
Surprisingly, over a hundred of the comments deal with a suggestion for Pinterest that was not addressed in the update: the prevalence of pornography on the site.
“[N]ow get rid of the porn on here…” wrote Kimberly Lewis.
Lauren Rae Orsini is a web culture reporter who specializes in anime and the business of fandom. Her work has been published by Forbes and Business Insider.