- The best haunted house movies to watch online in 2019 Today 4:13 PM
- Andy Ngo seen laughing as Patriot Prayer members plan an attack in newly emerged video Today 3:59 PM
- How to stream Manchester City vs. Bournemouth Today 3:25 PM
- Catholic priest allegedly spent church money on Grindr hookups Today 3:04 PM
- Nicolás Maduro’s English Twitter account was suspended with no public explanation Today 2:06 PM
- Man claims ex-girlfriend killed his dog after he broke up with her Today 1:02 PM
- What are BitTorrent downloads and how do they work? Today 12:58 PM
- ICE cuts the cord on real immigrant hotline after being featured in ‘Orange Is the New Black’ Today 10:49 AM
- The 10 best music podcasts for artist interviews and criticism in 2019 Today 10:41 AM
- How a socialist Twitch streamer landed in a feud with Dan Crenshaw Today 10:07 AM
- How to prepare for your fantasy football draft (and season) Today 9:00 AM
- Kit Harington is joining the MCU–and people are guessing which character he will play Today 8:48 AM
- How to live stream Juan Francisco Estrada vs. Dewayne Beamon Today 8:00 AM
- The 5 best free torrent clients you can download in 2019 Today 8:00 AM
- How to stream Saints vs. Jets in NFL preseason action Today 7:49 AM
Twitter users are trying to prove the tech company’s censorship of conservative voices with the trending #VerifiedHate.
The hashtag flags tweets by verified, liberal users who supporters say violate Twitter’s terms of service by using or promoting hate speech. They’re looking for retribution for far-right activists like Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer, among others, who had their accounts unverified last year for promoting hateful content.
This latest chapter in the saga of the digital First Amendment took off on Friday but can be traced back to Aug. 7 when Twitter user @PabloTheWise tweeted “So @twitter is allowing racist hate speech by leftists from verified accounts to continue, while blanket censoring conservatives. Anyone else bothered by this? #VerifiedHate.”
But the hashtag didn’t really blow up until this week, when Twitter user @meme_amerIca started compiling tweets by verified users that express antipathy toward whites and white supremacy.
@meme_amerIca’s account is currently focused on tweets like this one TV writer Mike Drucker posted in 2012:
A screenshot of the tweet is superimposed on a photo of Drucker, along with information about his career.
@meme_amerIca has repeated this formula for writers from BuzzFeed, CNN and Vice, among others. The compilations make it easy to see that the users tweeting “anti-white sentiment” are themselves white.
While some of the tweets are more violent and reference “white genocide,” many simply express frustration with the stupid, hateful, offensive, and violent things that white people (given that whiteness as the dominant culture) do all the time. And, as white people, the tweeters implicitly include themselves in that group.
Twitter’s policy prohibits hateful conduct against others “on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.” Specific examples of such conduct include, “violent threats; wishes for the physical harm, death, or disease of individuals or groups; references to mass murder, violent events, or specific means of violence in which/with which such groups have been the primary targets or victims; behavior that incites fear about a protected group; repeated and/or non-consensual slurs, epithets, racist and sexist tropes, or other content that degrades someone.”
Certainly on their face, some of the tweets, particularly jokes about white genocide, cited under #VerifiedHate would violate the terms of service. But Twitter also includes a section about the context of the speech.
For example, this tweet from BuzzFeed writer Tracy Clayton is written in a caricature of slave vernacular and is a response to a Black comedian.
The context of the tweet is that it’s quite clearly a joke and commentary on how Black people have been portrayed by white culture for decades. But #VerifiedHate doesn’t look at the context of the tweets in question and whether they’re written by comedians of color pushing back against with humor or white members of the media expressing frustration with racism and ignorance. Accounts like @meme_amerIca are branding them as “hateful” and demanding that Twitter take away the accounts’ verification. Twitter did not immediately respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment.
While some of the tweets are unprofessional, especially for members of the media, they’re not calling for an ethnostate, like Richard Spencer uses Twitter to do. And Spencer and others like him still have use of the platform. They don’t have the little blue check of credibility, but they haven’t been banned (yet).
The #VerifiedHate hashtag even seized upon President Donald Trump’s tweet claiming wide-scale murders of white South African farmers, although there’s no evidence to support the assertion.
The South African government has proposed laws to take farmland from white South Africans and give it to previously disadvantaged (that is, non-white) South Africans. It’s a move to make amends for hundreds of years of brutality under apartheid and give Black, Indian and other South Africans a color a chance at economic equality. The proposal has not moved forward in the South African Parliament.
The #VerifiedHate hashtag also makes an appearance on 8chan’s Politically Incorrect thread among posts denigrating Jewish and Black people. There, too, critics assert that liberals are getting away with “open racism” on Twitter, throwing context out the window and disregarding the definition of racism itself.
Ellen Ioanes is the FOIA reporter at the Daily Dot, where she covers U.S. politics. She is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School, and her work has appeared in the Guardian, the Center for Public Integrity, HuffPost India, and more.