- How to stream Packers vs. Lions on Monday Night Football Sunday 7:15 PM
- College students burned author’s books after she spoke about white privilege Sunday 6:28 PM
- Texas police officer fatally shoots Black woman in her own home Sunday 3:44 PM
- Milo Yiannopoulos’ website dangerous.com was sold Sunday 1:42 PM
- First YouTube comment to hit 1 million likes is on Billie Eilish’s ‘bad guy’ music video Sunday 12:36 PM
- Girl says she was fired over exposing how Panera makes its mac and cheese on TikTok Sunday 11:34 AM
- David Harbour teased fans about Hopper’s ‘Stranger Things’ fate on ‘SNL’ Sunday 10:24 AM
- Kacey Musgraves accused of cultural appropriation–and botching it Sunday 9:19 AM
- Rihanna defends Vogue writer who received backlash for ‘winging’ interview Sunday 8:36 AM
- Here are the best PC games to add to your list Sunday 8:20 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 8 Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to stream Steelers vs. Chargers on Sunday Night Football Saturday 7:20 PM
- Popular TikTok teens accused of pretending to be gay for clout Saturday 6:38 PM
- Scott Walker’s ‘$26 haircut’ dig at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez backfires Saturday 4:46 PM
- Halle synagogue shooter allegedly posted manifesto on anime message board Saturday 4:06 PM
Right-wing websites and personalities are making a false equivalency connection between Vice President Mike Pence’s apparent rule about women to the claims that Hollywood executive Harvey Weinstein sexually abused, harassed and raped women.
While the connection is odd and the two things really have nothing to do with one another, that hasn’t stopped several conservative voices from somehow saying that Pence’s rule–not being alone in a room with a woman other than his wife–is somehow a golden standard for not committing sexual misconduct.
Weinstein stands accused of committing sexual crimes over the course of decades. Several women, including Angelina Jolie and Gwenyth Paltrow, detailed instances in which Weinstein allegedly asked to meet them in his hotel room, where, they say, he made unwanted sexual advances. For some conservatives, the problem isn’t simply Weinstein’s allegedly predatory behavior, it’s the setting.
“For those keeping score at home, Mike Pence could never be accused of wanting to have sex with someone other than his wife in these sorts of situations because he avoids putting himself and the other person into these situations,” writes Erick Erickson, of the Resurgent, a conservative blog.
“THINK: If Weinstein had obeyed @VP Pence’s rules for meeting with the opposite sex, none of those poor women would ever have been abused,” he wrote on Twitter on Tuesday night.
Meanwhile, Charlie Kirk, a conservative Twitter personality, put it more succinctly:
“The left was more upset at Mike Pence for being loyal to his wife than they are upset at Harvey Weinstein’s sexual assault actions,” he tweeted.
The left was more upset at Mike Pence for being loyal to his wife than they are upset at Harvey Weinstein's sexual assault actions— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) October 11, 2017
The comments by these conservatives seem to all revolve around one message: being alone with women offers the opportunity or temptation to assault them. Is the only thing standing in the way of sexual abuse not allowing yourself to be alone in the same room with a woman?
By adhering to Pence’s rule, it reinforces the (false) idea that all interactions between men and women are sexually charged and a third-party is necessary to stop anything from happening, consensual or otherwise. By not putting oneself in that position, some argue, there is no moral quandary a man has to face, not to mention an admission of a lack of trust in oneself.
Here’s more from Erickson’s blog, published on Wednesday morning:
“The media and the left savaged Mike Pence for his principled stand, but they will never run stories about Mike Pence sexually harassing women. They’ll never run stories about women unsure whether Pence was propositioning them or if they were reading too much into something. And Mike Pence’s wife, who is the most important person in Pence’s life, will never have to worry about his fidelity.”
Essentially, Erickson is arguing that because Pence never puts himself alone with women, there is no opportunity for him to commit a sexual assault–or to be accused of committing sexual assault—which is ignoring the obvious: Being alone with a woman is not an invitation to rape her. The assumption that sexual assault or harassment only happens when women are alone is also not true.
According to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN), an anti-sexual violence organization, 55 percent of sexual assault occurs at or near a victim’s home, 15 percent occurs in an open space, 12 percent occurs at or near a relative’s home, 10 percent occurs in an enclosed but public area, and 8 percent occurs on school property.
All of this doesn’t even take into account how Pence’s “rule” also puts women at a professional disadvantage, which was written about at length following an article that highlighted Pence avoiding one-on-one meetings with women.
But Erickson isn’t alone. The idea of equating Pence’s rules and Weinstein’s alleged misconduct is running rampant on right-wing Twitter.
Harvey Weinstein allegedly rapes young actresses, but remember Mike Pence who does not have dinner on his own with young women - MONSTER!— Laura Perrins (@LPerrins) October 11, 2017
Still waiting for all the liberal Hollywood victims of Harvey Weinstein to walk back their mocking of Mike Pence.— sethdsimmons (@sethdsimmons) October 11, 2017
Pence’s rule and Weinstein’s sexual abuse both inherently show that men see women as beneath them, albeit in different ways. Sarah Skwire, of the Foundation for Economic Education, summed up the situation well: “Don’t isolate [women] behind locked doors. And don’t grope them there either.”
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).