- YouTuber to pay restitution after a teen fan died copying her video 4 Years Ago
- Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts to an accuser, including a pic of her children Today 9:38 AM
- Facebook suspended tens of thousands of apps after Cambridge Analytica scandal Today 8:24 AM
- How to stream Browns vs. Rams on Sunday Night Football Today 6:00 AM
- How to watch ‘NFL Primetime’ on ESPN+ Today 5:00 AM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Chelsea Friday 6:45 PM
- How to stream Real Madrid vs. Sevilla Friday 6:35 PM
- How to stream Peter ‘Kid Chocolate’ Quillin vs. Alfredo Angulo Friday 5:16 PM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Granada Friday 4:50 PM
- ‘Atlantics’ tells a ghost story steeped with emotion and realism Friday 4:16 PM
- ‘Jojo Rabbit’ is a sweet, singular movie that loses its grip on satire Friday 3:40 PM
- Jordan Peterson is in rehab for Klonopin addiction Friday 3:34 PM
- The cat-worshipping turkey cult video, explained Friday 3:22 PM
- Despite legal threats and drama, the Area 51 desert event is on Friday 3:05 PM
- How to stream Yair Rodriguez vs. Jeremy Stephens on UFC Fight Night Friday 3:00 PM
AT&T says net neutrality is a violation of its right to free speech
How will the FCC respond?
The Federal Communications Commission reclassified broadband as a common carrier in February, essentially prohibiting Internet service providers from blocking websites and throttling online services. Trade organizations representing major telecom providers like AT&T and Verizon announced lawsuits opposing the rules almost immediately.
After the FCC’s final rules were published last month, however, AT&T announced plans to file its own lawsuit against the FCC. A document filed on May 15 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which is hearing the case, previews the issues that the company plans to raise in court.
AT&T will first ask the court to determine whether the FCC’s decision to reclassify broadband “violates the terms of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.”
Essentially, AT&T contends that the reclassification violates its First Amendment right to free speech by preventing it from controlling or blocking Web traffic whenever, and however, it wants. The FCC has previously stated that ISPs are conduits for the free speech of others and that net neutrality is intended to prevent that speech from being burdened for an ISP’s profit.
AT&T further argues that when the FCC reclassified broadband as a public utility, the agency violated the Fifth Amendment, which states that “private property” cannot be “taken for public use, without just compensation.”
The FCC is also facing lawsuits on similar grounds from Alamo Broadband, a small Texas-based ISP, and the trade groups USTelecom, CTIA – The Wireless Association, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA), and the American Cable Association.
AT&T’s legal argument is not novel. A federal appeals court overturned prior FCC rules prohibiting ISPs from discriminating against Internet traffic in 2012. Verizon, which brought that case, had argued on similar free-speech grounds, but the court’s decision was based solely on the fact that broadband was not classified as a public utility at the time.
“We solved that,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in early May. “That issue’s gone.”
Wheeler added that he was “confident” that the court will rule in net neutrality’s favor.
Dell Cameron was a reporter at the Daily Dot who covered security and politics. In 2015, he revealed the existence of an American hacker on the U.S. government's terrorist watchlist. He is a co-author of the Sabu Files, an award-nominated investigation into the FBI's use of cyber-informants. He became a staff writer at Gizmodo in 2017.