The company made the announcement on Sunday morning, noting that the platform will still allow users who support Trump and his administration. The users just aren’t allowed to voice their support for Trump on the platform.
“We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy,” part of the statement read. “Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy.”
The company added that the ban is not an endorsement of any political party, and it’s also not an attempt at shunning conservative voices.
“We are definitely not banning conservative politics. Hate groups and intolerance are different from other types of political positions,” the statement read.
It also warned users to refrain from trying to “weaponize this policy by entrapping people who do support the Trump administration into voicing their support,” and not to “antagonize conservative members for their unstated positions.”
Within hours of Ravelry’s announcement on Twitter, thousands of people began showing their support–with some urging other social media platforms to follow in its footsteps.
— Margaret H. Willison (@MrsFridayNext) June 23, 2019
Deplatforming fascism is a good thing. Support Ravelry, and ask your favorite community sites when they will do the same thing. https://t.co/aXOw8K94vb
— Gillian Smith (@gillianmsmith) June 23, 2019
It encouraged many to sign up for the platform–with some even taking up knitting.
This makes me want to start knitting again.
— Susan R (@99snoozballons) June 23, 2019
Former journalist Hillary Sargent posted a Twitter thread detailing why she thought this was a bad move on Ravelry’s part.
“The way out of where we are as a country IS NOT to vilify every person who passively or actively supports @realDonaldTrump,” she wrote in a tweet. “Ravelry was never overrun with white supremacists sharing swastika afghan patterns. Suggesting that knitters who voted for Trump are dangerous is bonkers.”
Others also suggested that this move borders on censorship and a strong political stance–straying from the platform’s agenda of inclusivity.
Refuters to that sentiment argued that this is just a matter of differentiating between morality and politics which, under the current administration, has become difficult to separate.
When your political and religious beliefs insist on harming others in a real-world way (aka Trumpers), that's where tolerance ends. Bye!
— Jody Wallace (@jodywallace) June 23, 2019
What you’re missing here is the entire thing. It’s not politics, it’s principle. They believe Trump and his administration support white supremacy, so supporting him is also supporting white supremacy. They don’t want to enable that on their site.
— SquintingDog (@clepro) June 23, 2019
It’s not clear whether users were being harassed by pro-Trump content and rhetoric. Ravelry did not immediately respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment.
I think it’s just the staff getting tired of of coping with the never-ending BS. Also, they’ve been more and more explicitly open to marginalized people recently.
— Naomi Parkhurst (@naogannet) June 23, 2019
Recently, social media platforms have struggled to find the proper balance of ensuring the right to free speech while still moderating hate speech. Facebook recently banned numerous far-right figures but is also having a hard time keeping white supremacy and nationalism off its platform. Twitter is also researching whether banning white supremacists from its own platform would be a productive move.
- The Trump 2020 bot campaign has begun
- Trump refuses to apologize for Central Park Five death penalty ads
- Trump gets banned from SeekingArrangement because he’s not a ‘real sugar daddy’
- Ravelry group knits toys for every Sandy Hook student
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.