- Redditor wants to know if he’s the a**hole for ghosting pregnant partner Thursday 8:19 PM
- How to go live on TikTok Thursday 8:08 PM
- Joey Salads suggests Democrats carried out Santa Clarita mass shooting Thursday 7:31 PM
- How influencers use TikTok to make money and launch careers Thursday 7:18 PM
- How to stream Argentina vs. Brazil live Thursday 6:51 PM
- How to watch Disney+ on a smart TV Thursday 6:28 PM
- Miss Fame calls out Justin Bieber for low music video appearance pay offer Thursday 6:19 PM
- Trump Jr. ranked No. 1 on best-seller list—after the GOP gave away copies of his book Thursday 5:45 PM
- How to get Disney+ bundle if you already subscribe to Hulu and/or ESPN+ Thursday 5:19 PM
- Mo’Nique suing Netflix for race and gender discrimination Thursday 5:09 PM
- Students outraged that professors accused of sexual misconduct are still teaching Thursday 5:00 PM
- TikTok users jokingly wear big hats to sneak snacks into movie theaters Thursday 3:59 PM
- Why today’s new facially recognition bill is being called ‘woefully’ inadequate Thursday 3:15 PM
- Facebook has given more user data to the government than ever before Thursday 2:57 PM
- How to sign up for Disney Plus Thursday 2:55 PM
Does anti-rape underwear really make women safer?
Are anti-rape garments like AR Wear making us safer, or profiting off every woman’s fear?
Every few years, it seems someone comes up with a new piece of clothing that will prevent rape. Earlier this month, a Nyack, New York–based group called AR Wear, spearheaded by entrepreneurs Ruth and Yuval, launched an Indiegogo campaign for “undergarments” that will apparently stop a sexual assault.
The clothing line, which boasts “confidence and protection that can be worn,” includes panties, leggings, and running shorts. In the video accompanying the campaign pitch, the company breaks down exactly what will stop a sexual assault: Only the woman wearing the undergarment can take it off, it’s resistant to cutting or pulling, and there are “thigh locks” as well as a lock on the waistband. AR Wear is also in the process of making “traveling shorts.”
This is all very well intentioned, but essentially, the message is that if a woman wants to prevent an assault, she needs to lock up certain parts of her body with a modern-day chastity belt. This subtly shifts the responsibility for avoiding rape from the attacker to the victim. As Anne Theriault of the Belle Jar points out, there are other factors to consider:
It also bears mentioning that idea behind this clothing operates off the assumption that most rapists are strangers, who attack women in dark alleys late at night, when actually the opposite is true—most rapists are acquaintances with, or even romantic partners of, the victim. So what would happen if a woman did have AR Wear’s Anti-Rape clothing on, removed said clothing of her own volition, and then was raped?
But AR Wear has read studies:
We read studies reviewing the statistics of resisting assault, whether by forceful or non-forceful means. We learned that resistance increases the chance of avoiding a completed rape without making the victim more likely to be physically injured. We concluded that an item of clothing that creates an effective barrier layer can allow women and girls to passively resist an attacker, in addition to any other form of resistance they may be able to carry out at the time of an assault.
In attacks like the ones AR Wear seeks to prevent, where the rape is largely about power, what’s to stop an attacker from inflicting violence on a woman—regardless of her undergarments?
The company is asking for $50,000 to complete the product line. A donation of $1,000 or more “will help get AR Wear to women and girls who do not have the means to buy it themselves,” and they will donate the clothing to a “charitable organization that provides anti–sexual violence services.”
Admirable. But these ideas for anti-rape clothing never go anywhere, and that’s because preventing rape has nothing to do with what a woman is wearing, or not wearing, and everything to do with the rapist and a culture of victim-blaming. Are panties with thigh locks really making us safer, or is every woman’s fear simply being exploited for profit?
Photo via AR Wear/Indiegogo
Audra Schroeder is the Daily Dot’s senior entertainment writer, and she focuses on streaming, comedy, and music. Her work has previously appeared in the Austin Chronicle, the Dallas Observer, NPR, ESPN, Bitch, and the Village Voice. She is based in Austin, Texas.