- Justin Bieber slid into the DMs of someone who hated his new album Today 1:05 PM
- HQ Trivia host and co-founder in Twitter feud amid shutdown Today 12:10 PM
- YouTuber shamed for fake call with Caroline Flack after her death Today 10:59 AM
- This MAGA-loving Keanu Reeves imposter isn’t fooling anyone Today 10:16 AM
- How to watch ‘Outlander’ season 5 online Today 8:00 AM
- Kobe Bryant’s complicated online legacy isn’t buried with him Today 6:00 AM
- TikTok teen’s reaction to discovering boyfriend’s cheating goes viral Saturday 4:46 PM
- This may be the creepiest Amazon review you’ll ever read Saturday 3:58 PM
- Bill Maher booed on own show over defense of Bloomberg Saturday 3:37 PM
- The Sun allegedly deletes negative Caroline Flack story after her death Saturday 2:48 PM
- How to watch ‘American Idol’ season 18 Saturday 2:00 PM
- James Blake defends girlfriend Jameela Jamil amid allegations she’s faking her illnesses Saturday 1:46 PM
- Viral video purports to show doctors with guns amid coronavirus outbreak Saturday 1:07 PM
- Russian YouTubers pretend to be Greta Thunberg, share alleged prank call with Bernie Sanders Saturday 11:07 AM
- TikTok teens are shaving off their eyebrows to ‘look like’ Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid Saturday 10:25 AM
Comcast wants to charge you more for better privacy
Can you afford to be private?
Comcast’s lawyers argued in a letter to the Federal Communications Commission this week that the company should be allowed to charge its customers to maintain their privacy online.
Internet companies are determined to get their hands on user data, including browsing habits, typically through deep packet inspection, a technique which examines every unit of data between its source and destination.
More simply, Comcast would like to comprehensively track users’ web history, search activity, and other online behavior. It would also like to charge customers a fee for not doing so.
The collection of such data is often called “snoopverstising,” because companies like Comcast will sell it to outside agencies for marketing and advertising purposes.
“A bargained-for exchange of information for service is a perfectly acceptable and widely used model throughout the U.S. economy, including the Internet ecosystem, and is consistent with decades of legal precedent and policy goals related to consumer protection and privacy,” Comcast said in its letter.
Earlier this year, AT&T was ridiculed by journalist Karl Bode, who’s been closely reporting on snoopvertising developments for years, after the company claimed people who didn’t opt-out of its tracking were really receiving a “discount.”
To put it another way, users who did not want to be tracked are charged an additional $30 a month on their bill. But instead of calling this a “privacy surcharge,” AT&T assumed it might go over better with customers if they claimed users who allowed tracking were receiving a discount instead.
Isn’t that neat?
As Bode wrote Wednesday at DSL Reports:
In short, Comcast is arguing that protecting your own privacy should be a paid luxury option, and stopping them from doing so would raise broadband rates. But as we’ve noted for years it’s the lack of competition that keeps broadband prices high. It’s also the lack of competition that prevents users upset with broadband privacy practices from switching to another ISP. That’s why the FCC thinks some basic privacy rules of the road might be a good idea.
Dell Cameron was a reporter at the Daily Dot who covered security and politics. In 2015, he revealed the existence of an American hacker on the U.S. government's terrorist watchlist. He is a co-author of the Sabu Files, an award-nominated investigation into the FBI's use of cyber-informants. He became a staff writer at Gizmodo in 2017.