- Report: Facebook collects app data on users’ body weight, menstrual cycles Today 3:38 PM
- Amy Klobuchar reportedly ate salad with a comb, and Twitter’s got questions Today 2:47 PM
- Nobody likes Spotify’s new update Today 2:34 PM
- Student assaulted on campus while tabling for right-wing group Today 1:56 PM
- Kim Kardashian West sues fashion company for using her likeness to sell clothes Today 1:12 PM
- The Oscar-nominated movies you’ll actually want to watch again Today 12:56 PM
- Viral graphic shows the moment Apple became the top brand Today 12:27 PM
- Jake Paul calls out KSI for a YouTube boxing match Today 11:31 AM
- This elementary school made students play ‘runaway slave’ Today 11:20 AM
- ‘Captain Marvel’ is already a box office hit Today 11:06 AM
- This ‘buff bunny vs. small bunny’ meme is here for when you’re feeling inferior Today 10:53 AM
- Ocasio-Cortez slams trolls who come at her with ‘weak’ memes Today 10:52 AM
- YouTube just made it awfully easy to harass creators Today 10:16 AM
- Report: Trump the only 2020 contender who won’t rule out using stolen data Today 9:01 AM
- House Republicans offer bipartisan net neutrality bill—but there’s a catch Today 8:30 AM
Turns out the move away from favorites wasn’t a site-killer.
When Twitter decided to ditch its star-shaped favorite button for the heart-shaped like button, it caused an uproar. But new research suggests that, once the outrage died down, people opened their hearts to the heart.
Social-media analytics firm Locowise discovered a nearly 28-percent jump in the use of the feature since Twitter changed its name and appearance. The study looked at more than 1,500 Twitter accounts over a three-month period both before and after the change, for a total of more than 2.2 million tweets.
Locowise’s findings seem to indicate a continuation of the trend that Twitter saw a week after switching to hearts. The company reported a six-percent increase in likes by existing users and a nine-percent jump among new users in the initial week.
Speaking at the Open Mobile Summit, Kevin Weil, Twitter’s senior vice president of product, explained that the company made the change because hearts were “easier to understand.”
According to Sahail Ashraf of Locowise, that isn’t always the case; sometimes the heart can complicate matters. Ashraf suggested in a blog post that the heart didn’t offer the same flexibility as the star when it came to news-related tweets. “Adding a heart to a news tweet about a terrorist event?” Ashraf wrote. “That, arguably, kind of makes for a slightly more uncomfortable experience.”
Dr. Pamela B. Rutledge, director of the Media Psychology Research Center, told the Daily Dot that one explanation for the rise in engagement is that “the heart and the star have fundamentally different symbolic meanings.”
“The heart is about emotion, the star is about social value, preference or ‘importance,'” Rutledge said. “Emotions are an extension of self and, thus, carry greater importance to both the sender and the receiver.”
Twitter’s decision to embrace the heart may have led to a change in the way people interact on the platform, but it’s still not drawing new users—and that makes Twitter’s heart break.
H/T AdWeek | Illustration via Max Fleishman
AJ Dellinger is a seasoned technology writer whose work has appeared in Digital Trends, International Business Times, and Newsweek. In 2018, he joined Gizmodo as the nights and weekend editor.