- Trump supporters are abandoning Fox News over network’s latest hire 12 Months Ago
- QAnon is attacking a random woman in a disturbing and dangerous way 12 Months Ago
- Google celebrates Bach with AI-powered, music-making doodle 12 Months Ago
- RIP: The best free trial in all of streaming entertainment Today 2:19 PM
- Which ‘Florida Man’ are you? Today 1:06 PM
- Hundreds of millions of Facebook passwords were accessible to employees Today 12:55 PM
- ‘Bitch I’m Bella Thorne’ morphs into TikTok dyslexia meme Today 12:17 PM
- Marvel is auctioning props and costumes from Netflix’s ‘Defenders’ franchise Today 12:12 PM
- Net neutrality advocates plan online watch party for the ‘Save the Internet’ Act Today 12:01 PM
- Tim Cook turns his iPad meme into an AirPod meme Today 11:46 AM
- Auschwitz Memorial asks visitors to stop taking playful photos at Holocaust site Today 11:33 AM
- The best Korean beauty products for $15 or less Today 10:50 AM
- PewDiePie’s reign as the No. 1 YouTuber seems to be over Today 10:43 AM
- Amazon’s ‘Hanna’ miniseries offers a more conventional take on the teen spy thriller Today 10:42 AM
- Conservative writer tweets about bombing a university after women are hired Today 10:16 AM
JD Lasica/Flickr (CC-BY)
The theoretical fine would put the social network out of business.
How did we get to this point? It started in 2011 when Facebook made a settlement with the FTC after it was caught deceiving users about their privacy rights. This won’t come as a shock to anyone following the company’s recent struggles, but the FTC found Facebook breached privacy regulations when it repeatedly shared user data despite assuring the information would be kept private.
Instead of slamming the social network with a hefty fine, the FTC punished it by imposing a 20-year mandate barring the company “from making any further deceptive privacy claims” and requiring it get consumers’ approval before changing the way it shares their data.
In light of the recent Cambridge Analytica data scandal, the FTC has opened a “non-public investigation” to determine whether Facebook breached the legal agreement. In March, reports from the Observer and New York Times revealed political data firm Cambridge Analytica collected the personal information of millions of Facebook members and used it to manipulate their vote. The data was collected from a third-party app posing as a personality test and was later sold to Cambridge Analytica.
While around 270,000 users downloaded the app, its permissions allowed it to collect data from their friends. In total, 87 million people—including 71 million Americans—had their data exploited.
But that doesn’t get us to the estimated $7.5 trillion fine. Reinforcements come in the form of CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledging that “malicious actors” took advantage of a vulnerability in search and account recovery features and harvested data on “most” of Facebook’s 2.2 billion users. Using a “conservative estimate” from the Washington Post, an additional 110 million Americans (half of all Americans with a Facebook account) likely had their data scraped.
That brings the individual number of data breach incidents affecting U.S. Facebook users to around 180 million. If the FTC determines Facebook broke its agreement in both cases, it could fine up to $41,484 per offense. Take the number of offenses and multiply it by the maximum fee and you’ve got a fatal fine of around $7.5 trillion.
Obviously, a 13-digit fine would wipe Facebook off the internet for good, especially since its value dropped more than $100 billion in the few weeks since the Cambridge Analytica scandal was revealed to the public. In fact, the fine would amount to more money than is even in circulation, using the Federal Reserve’s $1.63 trillion estimates.
It’s very unlikely that the FTC would impose the fine to its fullest extent. Nevertheless, the social network is already on the defensive.
“We reject any suggestion of violation of the consent decree,” a Facebook spokesperson told the Post. “We respected the privacy settings that people had in place. Privacy and data protections are fundamental to every decision we make.”
The FTC would more likely use the theoretical fine as leverage to force Facebook to change its privacy practices. It could potentially limit how much data advertisers collect on users, a move that would threaten the company’s main source of income. It could also pressure the social network to build more tools for users to protect their information. Whatever the case, Zuckerberg and Co. would likely jump to action with trillions of dollars on the line.
H/T Washington Post
Phillip Tracy is a former technology staff writer at the Daily Dot. He's an expert on smartphones, social media trends, and gadgets. He previously reported on IoT and telecom for RCR Wireless News and contributed to NewBay Media magazine. He now writes for Laptop magazine.