- YouTubers Eugenia Cooney and Shane Dawson make a joint comeback 3 Months Ago
- The crushing effects of Trump’s abortion ‘gag rule’ on healthcare Today 8:00 AM
- How to live stream Pacquiao vs. Thurman Today 6:20 AM
- Review: Hulu with Live TV ensures you always have something to watch Today 6:00 AM
- How to live stream UFC on ESPN 4: Rafael dos Anjos vs. Leon Edwards Today 5:49 AM
- 2020 Democrats refuse to answer our questions about ‘Cats’ Friday 4:14 PM
- Belle Delphine’s Instagram account removed after mass reporting campaign Friday 4:08 PM
- Mariah Carey refuses old-age FaceApp challenge Friday 3:19 PM
- Journalists horrified by consolidation of Gatehouse, Gannett Friday 3:12 PM
- Facebook and Google could be tracking you on porn sites Friday 1:42 PM
- 7 best sites for psychic love readings Friday 1:20 PM
- Driver demonstrates why you always need to read road signs Friday 12:58 PM
- Area 51 remix video proves it’s the summer of Lil Nas X Friday 12:26 PM
- ‘ICE will come’: Convenience store clerk threatens customers speaking Spanish Friday 12:11 PM
- Rand Paul dodges questions about 9/11 Victims Fund, says ‘watch Fox News’ Friday 11:51 AM
Photo Mix/Pixabay (Public Domain)
A new study from the University of Glasgow suggests that modern music consumption has caused a significant spike in greenhouse gas emissions, Pitchfork reports.
University of Oslo professor Kyle Devine, lead researcher for the study, says that despite the use of plastic by the recording industry falling dramatically since the days of vinyl, cassettes, and CDs, environmental harms still persist due to streaming.
Pitchfork notes that the amount of plastic used to package CDs and other physical music formats went from 61 million kilograms in 2000 to just 8 million kilograms in 2016. But when looking at the amount of energy used to stream music content, the picture becomes much more bleak.
“The figures may even suggest that the rises of downloading and streaming are making music more environmentally friendly,” says Devine. “But a very different picture emerges when we think about the energy used to power online music listening. Storing and processing music online uses a tremendous amount of resources and energy—which has a high impact on the environment.”
Devine’s team analyzed plastic production and the amount of electricity generated by streaming to determine their greenhouse gas equivalents (GHGs) and found that streaming “has led to an increasingly negative impact on the environment.”
“While 140 million kilograms of GHGs were generated in 1977, 136 million kilograms in 1988, and 157 million in 2000,” Pitchfork states. “By 2016, the generation of GHGs by storing and transmitting digital music files was estimated to be between 200-350 million kilograms in the U.S. alone.”
The study also found that while environmental concerns have risen, the cost of accessing music has reached an all time low.
“In 1997, consumers were willing to pay roughly 4.83 percent of an average weekly salary. That percentage decreased to roughly 1.22 percent of an average weekly salary in 2013,” Pitchfork adds. “Since the advent of streaming, the research shows that consumers now pay only just over 1 percent of their weekly salary to listen to a vast library of music.”
- IKEA and Sonos teamed up to make a fancy speaker lamp
- ‘Game of Thrones’ just announced an album featuring the Weeknd, SZA, and Travis Scott
- Brother Nature and Mason Ramsey bop to ‘Old Town Road’
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.