- ‘Carmen Sandiego’ reinvents its thieving protagonist as a role model action hero 12 Months Ago
- How to watch ‘Power’ online for free Today 6:00 AM
- What you need to know about DVR on FuboTV Today 5:30 AM
- Spotify will soon let you block R. Kelly Monday 6:01 PM
- New Click to Pray app lets you pray with Pope Francis Monday 5:30 PM
- Social media influencer known for hiking in bikinis dead at 36 Monday 4:54 PM
- Trump posts altered pics on social media to make fingers look longer, report Monday 3:20 PM
- Twitch user banned after telling woman to ‘kill yourself’ during stream Monday 3:06 PM
- Facebook introduces ‘Community Actions’ tool to petition the government Monday 2:04 PM
- Sarah Sanders, NRA deliver truly misguided MLK tributes Monday 12:58 PM
- MAGA teen who confronted Native elder says he ‘respects all races’ Monday 12:57 PM
- Popular YouTube channel in danger of disappearing because of copyright claims Monday 12:24 PM
- The Krassensteins’ Reddit AMA gets trolled off the internet Monday 12:08 PM
- No, Trump didn’t break open the Pizzagate scandal in 2011 Monday 11:23 AM
- Producer of anti-abortion film says Facebook refuses to run his ads Monday 10:58 AM
YouTube could become the next election-hacking target, senator warns
Mark Warner/Flickr (CC-BY-SA)
With the Guardian report last week that YouTube’s algorithm recommended anti-Hillary Clinton and pro-Donald Trump videos at a much higher rate than vice versa during the 2016 election, Warner—a member of the Senate’s Intelligence Committee—said he’s concerned about YouTube becoming another instrument for foreign adversaries.
“Companies like YouTube have immense power and influence in shaping the media and content that users see,” Warner said, via the Guardian. “I’ve been increasingly concerned that the recommendation engine algorithms behind platforms like YouTube are, at best, intrinsically flawed in optimizing for outrageous, salacious, and often fraudulent content. … At worst, they can be highly susceptible to gaming and manipulation by bad actors, including foreign intelligence entities.”
Google, which owns YouTube, was critical of the Guardian’s methodology and conclusion into how the “up next” videos, which deliver a huge bulk of traffic and keep the viewer on the site for longer, are determined. YouTube doesn’t discuss the specificity of its algorithm, but it did say, “Our search and recommendation systems reflect what people search for, the number of videos available, and the videos people choose to watch on YouTube. That’s not a bias towards any particular candidate; that is a reflection of viewer interest.”
That answer doesn’t satisfy the senator.
Said Warner, “The [tech] platform companies have enormous influence over the news we see and the shape of our political discourse, and they have an obligation to act responsibly in wielding that power.”
H/T the Hill
Josh Katzowitz is the Weekend Editor for the Daily Dot and covers the world of YouTube. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. He’s also a longtime sports writer, covering the NFL for CBSSports.com and boxing for Forbes. His work has been noted twice in the Best American Sports Writing book series.