- Khloé Kardashian angers followers with a calorie-counting joke about True 4 Weeks Ago
- Spider-Man may no longer be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe 4 Weeks Ago
- Robert De Niro’s company is suing ex-employee for binge-watching Netflix at work Today 4:41 PM
- Intentionally misgendering a character could get you banned from Borderlands 3 Today 4:06 PM
- Facebook pulls Trump re-election ad for targeting ‘strong women’ Today 4:03 PM
- Kamala Harris says she will restore net neutrality if elected Today 3:16 PM
- All 8 of the ‘Rocky’ movies, ranked Today 2:50 PM
- Everything you need to know about the Facebook conservative bias report Today 2:35 PM
- Study links emoji use to more sex Today 2:10 PM
- The chicken sandwich war is in full throttle on Twitter Today 1:47 PM
- Netflix’s ‘Sextuplets’ proves Marlon Wayans is no Eddie Murphy—or even Mike Myers Today 1:31 PM
- Facebook is finally rolling out its clear history tool Today 1:13 PM
- ‘Theater etiquette’ tweets surge after YouTuber cast in ‘Waitress’ Today 12:55 PM
- A GoFundMe for Eric Garner’s killer has raised more than $70,000 Today 12:49 PM
- YouTuber finds GoPro footage of man who drowned in 2017 Today 12:20 PM
Anna Sorokin, the woman who posed as heiress Anna Delvey and grifted friends, associates, and businesses in New York City out of money and services, might not get to benefit from Shonda Rhimes’ upcoming Netflix series based on her life.
The 28-year-old was found guilty of grand larceny in April and sentenced to four to 12 years in prison. She told the New York Times in May that while she wasn’t sorry for what she did, she does “regret the way I went about certain things.” She claimed it wasn’t about money but power.
The saga is fertile ground for Rhimes, who picked up a Netflix overall deal in 2017 and set Sorokin’s story as her first project last year. But a 1977 New York state law named after serial killer David Berkowitz could disrupt any further money Sorokin receives from the deal.
According to the New York Post, the “Son of Sam” law has been invoked by the Attorney General’s office and would prohibit Sorokin from seeing “profits from a crime,” per Assistant Attorney General Adele Durand. Sorokin received $30,000 last year for the deal, though that went to lawyer’s fees. The Attorney General’s office is seeking to block current and future payments, including a $15,000-per-episode consulting fee and $7,500 in royalties. She also owes close to $200,000 in restitution to City National Bank.
The law prohibits convicted criminals from profiting off their stories and was previously applied to John Lennon’s murderer Mark David Chapman and Jean Harris, who was convicted of murdering Scarsdale Diet author Herman Tarnower.
Sorokin has still managed to capture the internet’s imagination while in prison—there’s an Instagram account dedicated to her “court looks“—though some of her courtroom behavior has been called out. A book by Rachel DeLoache Williams, one of the people Sorokin scammed, is out this week.
The Daily Dot has reached out to Netflix for comment.
- The ‘Big Little Lies’ finale sucked—but at least we have Renata
- Even real cats are transfixed by the enigma that is the ‘Cats’ trailer
- ‘Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee’ returns with Seinfeld making a racist joke about China
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
H/T New York Post
Audra Schroeder is the Daily Dot’s senior entertainment writer, and she focuses on streaming, comedy, and music. Her work has previously appeared in the Austin Chronicle, the Dallas Observer, NPR, ESPN, Bitch, and the Village Voice. She is based in Austin, Texas.