- Everyone’s trying to dance like Jennifer Lopez on TikTok 7 Months Ago
- Why the coronavirus bioweapon theory persists 7 Months Ago
- You won’t see deleted scenes on the ‘Rise of Skywalker’ home release Today 7:47 AM
- The return of ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ throws you right back into the fight Today 7:00 AM
- Am I overreacting to a Facebook message from a dating app match? Today 6:00 AM
- Buttigieg, Klobuchar come together to laugh at Bloomberg Wednesday 10:29 PM
- Bernie Sanders calls Bloomberg’s wealth ‘grotesque’ to his face Wednesday 9:53 PM
- Angry Bloomberg asks debate moderators if he’s ‘chicken liver’ Wednesday 9:29 PM
- Elizabeth Warren savages everyone else’s healthcare plan Wednesday 9:07 PM
- K-Pop stans help push ‘Pooping for Kaitlin’ hashtag mocking Kent State gun girl Wednesday 8:54 PM
- Fans speculate after learning Pop Smoke posted address prior to fatal home invasion Wednesday 8:11 PM
- Jar of human tongues found in Florida has people shook Wednesday 6:39 PM
- Video of Blueface teaching Obama lookalike to dance is turning heads Wednesday 5:58 PM
- ‘No one has the range’ for this meme Wednesday 5:21 PM
- Mom confronts man who followed daughter through grocery store in viral video Wednesday 5:05 PM
Anna Sorokin, the woman who posed as heiress Anna Delvey and grifted friends, associates, and businesses in New York City out of money and services, might not get to benefit from Shonda Rhimes’ upcoming Netflix series based on her life.
The 28-year-old was found guilty of grand larceny in April and sentenced to four to 12 years in prison. She told the New York Times in May that while she wasn’t sorry for what she did, she does “regret the way I went about certain things.” She claimed it wasn’t about money but power.
The saga is fertile ground for Rhimes, who picked up a Netflix overall deal in 2017 and set Sorokin’s story as her first project last year. But a 1977 New York state law named after serial killer David Berkowitz could disrupt any further money Sorokin receives from the deal.
According to the New York Post, the “Son of Sam” law has been invoked by the Attorney General’s office and would prohibit Sorokin from seeing “profits from a crime,” per Assistant Attorney General Adele Durand. Sorokin received $30,000 last year for the deal, though that went to lawyer’s fees. The Attorney General’s office is seeking to block current and future payments, including a $15,000-per-episode consulting fee and $7,500 in royalties. She also owes close to $200,000 in restitution to City National Bank.
The law prohibits convicted criminals from profiting off their stories and was previously applied to John Lennon’s murderer Mark David Chapman and Jean Harris, who was convicted of murdering Scarsdale Diet author Herman Tarnower.
Sorokin has still managed to capture the internet’s imagination while in prison—there’s an Instagram account dedicated to her “court looks“—though some of her courtroom behavior has been called out. A book by Rachel DeLoache Williams, one of the people Sorokin scammed, is out this week.
The Daily Dot has reached out to Netflix for comment.
- The ‘Big Little Lies’ finale sucked—but at least we have Renata
- Even real cats are transfixed by the enigma that is the ‘Cats’ trailer
- ‘Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee’ returns with Seinfeld making a racist joke about China
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
H/T New York Post
Audra Schroeder is the Daily Dot’s senior entertainment writer, and she focuses on streaming, comedy, and music. Her work has previously appeared in the Austin Chronicle, the Dallas Observer, NPR, ESPN, Bitch, and the Village Voice. She is based in Austin, Texas.