- Guy gets roasted for throwing razor in the toilet to protest Gillette Wednesday 9:23 PM
- Experts warn of uptick in ‘Ryuk’ ransomware after hackers net $3.7 million Wednesday 7:03 PM
- Video game composer boycotts Gillette after anti-toxic masculinity ad Wednesday 6:05 PM
- Steve Carell sitcom ‘Space Force’ heading to Netflix Wednesday 5:30 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘run train’ phrase becomes conservative sex controversy Wednesday 5:25 PM
- ‘Into’ is a reminder that queer businesses can be hurt by straight leaders Wednesday 5:13 PM
- TSA agents are the latest tool in the government shutdown meme war Wednesday 4:22 PM
- YouTube still hosting bestiality images year after crackdown pledge Wednesday 4:13 PM
- YouTuber quits fight after Darth Vader fan film claimed by Disney Wednesday 3:26 PM
- Millions of Fortnite accounts exposed via Epic Games website exploit Wednesday 2:26 PM
- A man found a camera in his Airbnb and the company didn’t seem to care Wednesday 2:00 PM
- A redditor planted an Easter egg in Hulu’s Fyre Fest doc Wednesday 1:51 PM
- This new revelation about Woody from ‘Toy Story’ will blow your mind Wednesday 1:35 PM
- Dave Rubin fails to delete Patreon on livestream to delete Patreon Wednesday 1:14 PM
- The ‘some of y’all… and it shows’ meme is taking over Twitter Wednesday 12:24 PM
This monkey probably can’t sue a photographer over a selfie, court says
‘Monkey see, monkey sue will not do in federal court.’
This is some monkey business.
A federal appeals court considered a lawsuit Wednesday by an Indonesian macaque named Naruto, the Los Angeles Times reported. The monkey allegedly grabbed photographer David Slater’s camera in 2011 to snap a selfie in an Indonesian forest.
Slater published the photo in a book, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sued on Naruto’s behalf. The animal rights group says the photographer infringed on the monkey’s rights.
“It is absurd to say a monkey can sue for copyright infringement,” said Angela Dunning, an attorney for the photographer, during a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. “Naruto can’t benefit financially from his work. He is a monkey.”
Last year, a federal district judge in San Francisco said Naruto lacked standing to sue. PETA appealed.
“Had the Monkey Selfies been made by a human using Slater’s unattended camera, that human would undisputedly be declared the author and copyright owner of the photographs,” PETA argued in the appeal brief. “Nothing in the Copyright Act limits its application to human authors.”
Dunning said PETA filed the case to promote an animal rights campaign. The group was “not even sure they have the right monkey,” Dunning said.
The crux of the case is whether the federal copyright act gives animals the right to sue.
According to the Times, Judge Carlos Bea questioned whether any U.S. Supreme Court decision says “man and monkey are the same.” Judge N. Randy Smith said there was no loss to the animal’s reputation or evidence that a copyright would have benefited Naruto financially, Smith said.
“I want to know what then is the injury,” Smith said, according to the Times.
Andrew Dhuey, who represents Slater, said PETA should be required to pay the photographer’s legal fees. Slater told the Guardian he’s so broke from the lawsuit that he couldn’t afford the flight to attend the court hearing.
“Monkey see, monkey sue will not do in federal court,” Dhuey said.
Well played. The 9th Circuit could make a ruling at any time.
Kris Seavers is the Evening Editor for the Daily Dot, where she covers breaking news, politics, and LGBTQ issues. Her work has appeared in Central Texas publications, including Austin Monthly and San Antonio Magazine, and on NPR.